Formulas for Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory royalty determination

D. Salant
{"title":"Formulas for Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory royalty determination","authors":"D. Salant","doi":"10.4018/jitsr.2009010105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper takes an axiomatic approach to determining ldquofair, reasonable, and non-discriminatoryrdquo (ldquoFRANDrdquo) royalties for intellectual property (ldquoIPrdquo) rights. Drawing on the extensive game theory literature on ldquosurplus sharing/cost sharingrdquo problems, the author describes specific formulas for determining license fees that can be derived from basic fairness principles. In particular, the author describes the Shapley value, the proportional sharing rule and the nucleolus. The proportional sharing rule has the advantage that it is the only rule that is invariant to mergers and splitting of the IP owners. The author also explains why, at times, there may be not acceptable to solution. Further, the author contrasts these rules with the efficient component pricing rule (ldquoECPRrdquo) suggested by Baumol and Swanson. Unlike, the ECPR, the rules identified in this paper can uniquely determine license fees when there is more than one owner of essential IP, and also incorporate various notions of fairness and equity.","PeriodicalId":126469,"journal":{"name":"2007 5th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 5th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jitsr.2009010105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This paper takes an axiomatic approach to determining ldquofair, reasonable, and non-discriminatoryrdquo (ldquoFRANDrdquo) royalties for intellectual property (ldquoIPrdquo) rights. Drawing on the extensive game theory literature on ldquosurplus sharing/cost sharingrdquo problems, the author describes specific formulas for determining license fees that can be derived from basic fairness principles. In particular, the author describes the Shapley value, the proportional sharing rule and the nucleolus. The proportional sharing rule has the advantage that it is the only rule that is invariant to mergers and splitting of the IP owners. The author also explains why, at times, there may be not acceptable to solution. Further, the author contrasts these rules with the efficient component pricing rule (ldquoECPRrdquo) suggested by Baumol and Swanson. Unlike, the ECPR, the rules identified in this paper can uniquely determine license fees when there is more than one owner of essential IP, and also incorporate various notions of fairness and equity.
公平、合理和非歧视的版税确定公式
本文采用一种公理方法来确定知识产权(ldquoIPrdquo)权利的不公平、合理和非歧视性的版税(ldquoofranddquo)。借鉴大量关于配额盈余分担/成本分担问题的博弈论文献,作者描述了从基本公平原则推导出的确定许可费用的具体公式。特别地,作者描述了Shapley值、比例共享规则和核仁。比例分享规则的优点是它是唯一对知识产权所有者合并和分裂不变的规则。作者还解释了为什么有时可能存在不可接受的解决方案。此外,作者将这些规则与Baumol和Swanson提出的有效组件定价规则(ldquoECPRrdquo)进行了对比。与ECPR不同的是,本文中确定的规则可以在重要知识产权不止一个所有者的情况下唯一地确定许可费用,并且还包含了各种公平和公平的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信