Utopias of participation: design, criticality, and emancipation

Shaowen Bardzell
{"title":"Utopias of participation: design, criticality, and emancipation","authors":"Shaowen Bardzell","doi":"10.1145/2662155.2662213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From its earliest incarnation in labor movements in Scandinavia in the 1970s, Participatory Design has had an emancipatory politics inscribed in it. As PD is appropriated in other contexts, this emancipatory politics can continue to be foregrounded or, as Bannon & Ehn (2013) worry, it can be diluted into corporate practices of \"user-centered design.\" One way to advance the emancipatory politics in PD is to continue PD's early embrace of utopian thinking. Yet utopianism today has a poor reputation, openly rejected by many activists. In this keynote, I will revisit some of the criticisms of utopianism. Next, I will explore an alternative framing of utopianism---derived from feminism and science fiction studies---that could productively inform PD, both epistemologically and methodologically, in its most openly political design goals. I will present some of the ways I have tied to engage with these ideas through design research projects ranging in scale from critical-participatory studies involving local makers to designing for and about the identities and aspirations of entire urban populations.","PeriodicalId":314843,"journal":{"name":"Participatory Design Conference","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Participatory Design Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2662155.2662213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

From its earliest incarnation in labor movements in Scandinavia in the 1970s, Participatory Design has had an emancipatory politics inscribed in it. As PD is appropriated in other contexts, this emancipatory politics can continue to be foregrounded or, as Bannon & Ehn (2013) worry, it can be diluted into corporate practices of "user-centered design." One way to advance the emancipatory politics in PD is to continue PD's early embrace of utopian thinking. Yet utopianism today has a poor reputation, openly rejected by many activists. In this keynote, I will revisit some of the criticisms of utopianism. Next, I will explore an alternative framing of utopianism---derived from feminism and science fiction studies---that could productively inform PD, both epistemologically and methodologically, in its most openly political design goals. I will present some of the ways I have tied to engage with these ideas through design research projects ranging in scale from critical-participatory studies involving local makers to designing for and about the identities and aspirations of entire urban populations.
参与的乌托邦:设计、批判和解放
参与式设计最早出现在20世纪70年代斯堪的纳维亚的劳工运动中,从那时起,参与式设计就带有一种解放的政治色彩。由于PD在其他环境中被挪用,这种解放政治可以继续被重视,或者,正如Bannon和Ehn(2013)所担心的那样,它可以被稀释为“以用户为中心的设计”的企业实践。延续PD早期对乌托邦思想的拥抱,是推进PD解放政治的途径之一。然而,今天的乌托邦主义名声不佳,被许多激进分子公开拒绝。在这个主题演讲中,我将回顾一些对乌托邦主义的批评。接下来,我将探索乌托邦主义的另一种框架——源自女权主义和科幻小说研究——它可以在认识论和方法论上有效地为PD提供最公开的政治设计目标。我将介绍一些我通过设计研究项目与这些想法联系在一起的方式,这些项目的规模从涉及当地制造商的关键参与性研究到为整个城市人口的身份和愿望而设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信