Towards a logical account of declassification

A. Banerjee, D. Naumann, S. Rosenberg
{"title":"Towards a logical account of declassification","authors":"A. Banerjee, D. Naumann, S. Rosenberg","doi":"10.1145/1255329.1255340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Declassification is a vital ingredient for practical use of secure systems. Several recent efforts to formulate an end-to-end policy for declassification seem inconclusive and have focused on apparently different aspects. (e.g., what values are involved, where in the code declassification occurs, when declassification happens and who (which principal) releases information.) In this informal paper, we argue that key security goals addressed by the proposed notions can be expressed using assertions and auxiliary state (such as event history), building on a recently developed logic for noninterference that provides for local reasoning about the heap","PeriodicalId":119000,"journal":{"name":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Workshop on Programming Languages and Analysis for Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1255329.1255340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Declassification is a vital ingredient for practical use of secure systems. Several recent efforts to formulate an end-to-end policy for declassification seem inconclusive and have focused on apparently different aspects. (e.g., what values are involved, where in the code declassification occurs, when declassification happens and who (which principal) releases information.) In this informal paper, we argue that key security goals addressed by the proposed notions can be expressed using assertions and auxiliary state (such as event history), building on a recently developed logic for noninterference that provides for local reasoning about the heap
对解密的逻辑解释
解密是安全系统实际使用的重要组成部分。最近几项制定端到端解密政策的努力似乎没有定论,而且侧重于明显不同的方面。(例如,涉及哪些值,在代码中解密发生的位置,何时解密发生以及谁(哪个主体)发布信息。)在这篇非正式的论文中,我们认为所提出的概念所解决的关键安全目标可以使用断言和辅助状态(如事件历史)来表达,建立在最近开发的非干扰逻辑上,该逻辑提供了关于堆的局部推理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信