Consideration of Total Station as Baseline for Tape Measurements Improvement in Holing Prediction at Underground Deep Level Gold Mine

G. Khoza, E. Fosso-Kankeu, H. Grobler
{"title":"Consideration of Total Station as Baseline for Tape Measurements Improvement in Holing Prediction at Underground Deep Level Gold Mine","authors":"G. Khoza, E. Fosso-Kankeu, H. Grobler","doi":"10.17758/iicbe3.c0322202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" Abstract — Over the last few years, accurate and safe break-through (holing) has been a problem in Underground deep level gold mines because of factors including the inherent inaccuracy of tape measurements. In this study, data collected from total station measurements and tape measurements in an underground deep level gold mine were compared using statistical analysis, then recommendations were made based on error margin. Tape surveying methods and recording of distance require human involvement at various stages of the process compared to total station measuring. It is therefore likely that the former method will be more prone to error. The margin between these two methods has never been evaluated in the context of ultra-deep level gold mining activities. The study tested the accuracy of tapes versus the accuracy of Total station using a hypothesis test, F test. It was found that tape measurements are less accurate from Total station measurements when applied for holing prediction in ultra-deep level gold mine. It is recommended that for high accuracy work the Total station should be used to measure underground stopes faces on a deep level gold","PeriodicalId":426472,"journal":{"name":"JCBEE-22 Mar. 17-18, 2022 Johannesburg (South Africa)","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCBEE-22 Mar. 17-18, 2022 Johannesburg (South Africa)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17758/iicbe3.c0322202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

 Abstract — Over the last few years, accurate and safe break-through (holing) has been a problem in Underground deep level gold mines because of factors including the inherent inaccuracy of tape measurements. In this study, data collected from total station measurements and tape measurements in an underground deep level gold mine were compared using statistical analysis, then recommendations were made based on error margin. Tape surveying methods and recording of distance require human involvement at various stages of the process compared to total station measuring. It is therefore likely that the former method will be more prone to error. The margin between these two methods has never been evaluated in the context of ultra-deep level gold mining activities. The study tested the accuracy of tapes versus the accuracy of Total station using a hypothesis test, F test. It was found that tape measurements are less accurate from Total station measurements when applied for holing prediction in ultra-deep level gold mine. It is recommended that for high accuracy work the Total station should be used to measure underground stopes faces on a deep level gold
考虑全站仪作为基准线改进地下深部金矿钻孔预测中的卷尺测量
摘要近年来,由于卷尺测量固有的不准确性等因素,在地下深部金矿中,准确安全的突破(钻孔)一直是一个难题。本文对某地下深部金矿全站仪测量数据与卷尺测量数据进行统计分析比较,并根据误差范围提出建议。与全站仪测量相比,纸带测量方法和距离记录在过程的各个阶段都需要人的参与。因此,前一种方法很可能更容易出错。这两种方法之间的余量从未在超深部金矿开采活动的背景下进行过评估。该研究使用假设检验(F检验)来测试磁带的准确性与全站仪的准确性。研究发现,在超深部金矿的钻孔预测中,卷尺测量的精度低于全站仪测量的精度。建议采用全站仪对深部金矿采场工作面进行高精度测量
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信