Palaeontological heritage: why legislate for it?

Geological Curator Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.55468/gc321
J. P. Abaide
{"title":"Palaeontological heritage: why legislate for it?","authors":"J. P. Abaide","doi":"10.55468/gc321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current emergence of new legal situations arising from the arising of new rights which, in turn, bring new interpretations to the discussion of concepts and theories relating to ethical values that involve humans and a modern capitalist society. The legal relationship between the state and the property included in its field in the past have been easily identified. Today, as government intervention in the economy contracts, questions arise about the relevance of their essential presence in the administration of this estate. So, in the list of new rights, environmental law comes with its various nuances. Standards have been studied that involve environmental protection in an almost coded manner, and arise because of an individualized area of study. However, as it is necessarily involved in other areas of law, this must lead again to rethinking and revisiting for a new theory. The enrichment of minorities to the detriment of the loss of public goods involves the loss of portions of national sovereignty and the citizenship of individuals. From the new Brazilian Constitutional Charter, whose state will be more vigilant compared to the assets that constitute their heritage, however, there is still no law regulating the updated protection and/or fossil trade, the consequences and reasons for which are explored. After consideration of the relevant legal articles pertaining to fossils, a classification scheme of fossils as public domain assets is proposed.","PeriodicalId":203203,"journal":{"name":"Geological Curator","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Curator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55468/gc321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current emergence of new legal situations arising from the arising of new rights which, in turn, bring new interpretations to the discussion of concepts and theories relating to ethical values that involve humans and a modern capitalist society. The legal relationship between the state and the property included in its field in the past have been easily identified. Today, as government intervention in the economy contracts, questions arise about the relevance of their essential presence in the administration of this estate. So, in the list of new rights, environmental law comes with its various nuances. Standards have been studied that involve environmental protection in an almost coded manner, and arise because of an individualized area of study. However, as it is necessarily involved in other areas of law, this must lead again to rethinking and revisiting for a new theory. The enrichment of minorities to the detriment of the loss of public goods involves the loss of portions of national sovereignty and the citizenship of individuals. From the new Brazilian Constitutional Charter, whose state will be more vigilant compared to the assets that constitute their heritage, however, there is still no law regulating the updated protection and/or fossil trade, the consequences and reasons for which are explored. After consideration of the relevant legal articles pertaining to fossils, a classification scheme of fossils as public domain assets is proposed.
古生物学遗产:为什么要立法?
由于新权利的产生而产生的新法律情况的出现,反过来又为涉及人类和现代资本主义社会的伦理价值的概念和理论的讨论带来了新的解释。过去,国家与包括在其领域内的财产之间的法律关系很容易确定。今天,随着政府对经济干预的收缩,人们开始质疑他们在这个产业管理中的重要作用。因此,在新权利的列表中,环境法带有各种细微差别。已经研究的标准几乎以编码的方式涉及环境保护,并且由于个性化的研究领域而产生。然而,由于它必然涉及法律的其他领域,这必须再次导致重新思考和重新审视一个新的理论。使少数人富裕而损害公共利益的丧失,涉及部分国家主权和个人公民权的丧失。然而,从新的巴西宪法宪章来看,与构成其遗产的资产相比,巴西政府将更加警惕,但仍然没有法律规范最新的保护和/或化石贸易,其后果和原因进行了探讨。在参考化石相关法律条文的基础上,提出了化石公共领域资产分类方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信