PROMOTING COLLABORATIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN A LARGE CLASS SIZE

S. Utami, I. Maftukhah, T. Tusyanah, Wijang Sakitri, Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum
{"title":"PROMOTING COLLABORATIVE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN A LARGE CLASS SIZE","authors":"S. Utami, I. Maftukhah, T. Tusyanah, Wijang Sakitri, Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum","doi":"10.20884/1.lead.2022.2.1.5500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines the features of collaborative feedback among students in their writing process in the blended learning environment and finds their experiences during this collaborative learning. This study used the qualitative method. Twenty texts of the students' writing were used as the primary data. Then, this research employed an interview and an observation. Through textual analysis and survey results, I first found a similar trend of texts the students primarily focused on in giving writing feedback. There are tenses, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. These facts mean that the students are good enough to understand the correct and incorrect features used in writing at those features. Second, during the implementation of this collaborative learning, students have the opportunity to negotiate any feedback, give and respond to any available text, and practice decision-making skills. These findings imply that first, lecturers are supposed to acknowledge the students' language skill level to create better material for them. Second, the students can be categorized as self-regulated, other-regulated, and object-regulated. The number of self-regulated and other-regulated learners is dominant compared to object-regulated ones. Understanding the type of learners is vital to developing a better approach in teaching and learning in a large class, especially for developing countries like Indonesia. The research is limited to a large class size where English is a foreign language. Hence, the method of blended learning for writing in a large class size needs to adjust to any local context. However, the challenges come from the students themselves, the classroom management, or the infrastructure available for teaching and learning. This collaborative feedback is a pedagogical breakthrough for most developing countries with many students.","PeriodicalId":194938,"journal":{"name":"LEAD (Language, Education and Development)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEAD (Language, Education and Development)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.lead.2022.2.1.5500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examines the features of collaborative feedback among students in their writing process in the blended learning environment and finds their experiences during this collaborative learning. This study used the qualitative method. Twenty texts of the students' writing were used as the primary data. Then, this research employed an interview and an observation. Through textual analysis and survey results, I first found a similar trend of texts the students primarily focused on in giving writing feedback. There are tenses, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. These facts mean that the students are good enough to understand the correct and incorrect features used in writing at those features. Second, during the implementation of this collaborative learning, students have the opportunity to negotiate any feedback, give and respond to any available text, and practice decision-making skills. These findings imply that first, lecturers are supposed to acknowledge the students' language skill level to create better material for them. Second, the students can be categorized as self-regulated, other-regulated, and object-regulated. The number of self-regulated and other-regulated learners is dominant compared to object-regulated ones. Understanding the type of learners is vital to developing a better approach in teaching and learning in a large class, especially for developing countries like Indonesia. The research is limited to a large class size where English is a foreign language. Hence, the method of blended learning for writing in a large class size needs to adjust to any local context. However, the challenges come from the students themselves, the classroom management, or the infrastructure available for teaching and learning. This collaborative feedback is a pedagogical breakthrough for most developing countries with many students.
促进高等教育大班合作学习
本研究考察了学生在混合式学习环境下写作过程中的协作反馈特征,并发现了学生在这种协作学习中的经验。本研究采用定性方法。学生写作的20篇文章作为主要数据。然后,本研究采用了访谈法和观察法。通过文本分析和调查结果,我首先发现了学生在给出写作反馈时主要关注的文本的类似趋势。有时态、标点、拼写和大写。这些事实意味着学生能够很好地理解这些特征在写作中使用的正确和错误特征。其次,在实施这种协作学习的过程中,学生有机会协商任何反馈,给出和回应任何可用的文本,并练习决策技能。这些发现意味着,首先,讲师应该承认学生的语言技能水平,为他们创造更好的材料。第二,学生可分为自我调节型、他人调节型和客体调节型。与客体调节型学习者相比,自我调节型学习者和他人调节型学习者占主导地位。了解学习者的类型对于制定更好的大班教学方法至关重要,特别是对于印度尼西亚这样的发展中国家。这项研究仅限于英语为外语的大班。因此,在大班教学中,混合式写作学习方法需要根据当地情况进行调整。然而,挑战来自学生本身、课堂管理或教学基础设施。这种协作反馈对大多数学生众多的发展中国家来说是一种教学上的突破。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信