The Effect of Molasses Application on Soil Biological Indicators and Maize Growth of Different Tillage Soil

P. A. Nugroho, Nándor Prettl, Zsolt Kotroczó, K. Juhos
{"title":"The Effect of Molasses Application on Soil Biological Indicators and Maize Growth of Different Tillage Soil","authors":"P. A. Nugroho, Nándor Prettl, Zsolt Kotroczó, K. Juhos","doi":"10.14232/jengeo-2023-44670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil enzyme activity and labile carbon (LC) have long been used as soil health indicators. Soil health can be improved by molasses addition resulting in better plant growth and productivity. The effect of molasses on soil biological activity and plant growth under different tillage soil has not been discussed in many studies in Hungary. We assessed two soil types under different long-term tillage practices: conservation tillage (CT), which leaves 30% or more residue on the soil surface, and conventional-ploughing tillage (PT). A pot experiment with maize as the crop was carried out using the composite soil (0-20 cm) of CT and PT; a randomized block design with four replications was employed. Three levels of molasses concentration, 0 g L-1, 0.05 g L-1, and 0.2 g L-1 were applied. LC, dehydrogenase (DHA), β-glucosidase activity, plant height, and dry weight biomass were measured at the end of the experiment (after eight weeks). The results indicated that LC in CT increased by 7.61-21.23% over the increase in molasses concentration. LC concentration was significantly higher in the CT than in the PT soil. β-glucosidase activity increased along with the increase of molasses concentration by 11.42-30.43% in CT and 16.03-56.67% in PT; however, the significantly different appeared only in PT soil. The molasses application affected the DHA as well. The activity of dehydrogenase increases by 39.49-80.76% and 30.43-50.59%, respectively, in CT and PT. Nevertheless, no significance occurred in the tillage system or the molasses concentration. Our study also found that the different molasses concentrations did not affect the plant height and dry weight biomass in CT and PT. However, applying each molasses concentration in CT markedly escalated the plant height and dry weight biomass compared to PT. The enhancement of soil biological activity and plant growth by the molasses application allows a promising strategy for maintaining the soil health of agricultural land.","PeriodicalId":115431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Geography","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/jengeo-2023-44670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil enzyme activity and labile carbon (LC) have long been used as soil health indicators. Soil health can be improved by molasses addition resulting in better plant growth and productivity. The effect of molasses on soil biological activity and plant growth under different tillage soil has not been discussed in many studies in Hungary. We assessed two soil types under different long-term tillage practices: conservation tillage (CT), which leaves 30% or more residue on the soil surface, and conventional-ploughing tillage (PT). A pot experiment with maize as the crop was carried out using the composite soil (0-20 cm) of CT and PT; a randomized block design with four replications was employed. Three levels of molasses concentration, 0 g L-1, 0.05 g L-1, and 0.2 g L-1 were applied. LC, dehydrogenase (DHA), β-glucosidase activity, plant height, and dry weight biomass were measured at the end of the experiment (after eight weeks). The results indicated that LC in CT increased by 7.61-21.23% over the increase in molasses concentration. LC concentration was significantly higher in the CT than in the PT soil. β-glucosidase activity increased along with the increase of molasses concentration by 11.42-30.43% in CT and 16.03-56.67% in PT; however, the significantly different appeared only in PT soil. The molasses application affected the DHA as well. The activity of dehydrogenase increases by 39.49-80.76% and 30.43-50.59%, respectively, in CT and PT. Nevertheless, no significance occurred in the tillage system or the molasses concentration. Our study also found that the different molasses concentrations did not affect the plant height and dry weight biomass in CT and PT. However, applying each molasses concentration in CT markedly escalated the plant height and dry weight biomass compared to PT. The enhancement of soil biological activity and plant growth by the molasses application allows a promising strategy for maintaining the soil health of agricultural land.
施用糖蜜对不同耕作方式土壤生物指标及玉米生长的影响
土壤酶活性和活性碳(LC)一直被作为土壤健康指标。添加糖蜜可以改善土壤健康,从而促进植物生长和生产力。在匈牙利,许多研究尚未讨论不同耕作方式下糖蜜对土壤生物活性和植物生长的影响。我们评估了两种不同长期耕作方式下的土壤类型:保护性耕作(CT)和常规耕作(PT),前者在土壤表面留下30%或更多的残留物。以玉米为作物,采用0 ~ 20 cm的CT和PT复合土进行盆栽试验;采用随机区组设计,共4个重复。糖蜜浓度分别为0 g L-1、0.05 g L-1和0.2 g L-1。实验结束时(8周后)测定LC、脱氢酶(DHA)、β-葡萄糖苷酶活性、株高和干重生物量。结果表明,随着糖蜜浓度的增加,CT中的LC增加了7.61 ~ 21.23%。LC浓度在CT土壤中显著高于PT土壤。β-葡萄糖苷酶活性随糖蜜浓度的增加而升高,分别为11.42 ~ 30.43%和16.03 ~ 56.67%;但只有在PT土中才有显著差异。糖蜜的施用对DHA也有影响。脱氢酶活性在CT和PT处理下分别提高了39.49 ~ 80.76%和30.43 ~ 50.59%,而耕作制度和糖蜜浓度对脱氢酶活性无显著影响。我们的研究还发现,不同浓度的糖蜜对试验区和试验区的植物高度和干重生物量没有影响。然而,与试验区相比,试验区施用不同浓度的糖蜜显著提高了植物的高度和干重生物量。通过施用糖蜜提高土壤生物活性和植物生长,为维持农田土壤健康提供了一种有希望的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信