{"title":"A Christian Habitus","authors":"Austin C. Kopack","doi":"10.6017/LV.V9I2.11129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is the relationship between preaching and living the Gospel? It is within the daily habits of those attempting to live out the Gospel together that preaching becomes intelligible and applicable. Sound preaching alone will fail to produce a transformed people whose lives reflect the teachings of scripture. This paper brings together the linguistic philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the theological anthropology of James K. A. Smith in order to develop an affective pedagogy that takes seriously the socially dependent nature of human persons. The social account of language proposed in the later Wittgenstein suggests that the meaning of concepts arises amongst pre-linguistic, embodied, communal practices. Theological language cannot be detached from its concrete expressions in the world because its meaning is dependent upon a communal form of life in which those concepts make sense. James K. A. Smith builds upon this pragmatist tradition to present a theory of doctrine and preaching grounded in liturgical practices that does justice to human physicality and characterizes all human practices, religious or otherwise, as structures of habitual formation with particular teloi. The Gospel, then, is not just a truth we learn to believe but a way of life that we come to embody contra competing “cultural liturgies.”","PeriodicalId":109688,"journal":{"name":"Lumen et Vita","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lumen et Vita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6017/LV.V9I2.11129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
What is the relationship between preaching and living the Gospel? It is within the daily habits of those attempting to live out the Gospel together that preaching becomes intelligible and applicable. Sound preaching alone will fail to produce a transformed people whose lives reflect the teachings of scripture. This paper brings together the linguistic philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein and the theological anthropology of James K. A. Smith in order to develop an affective pedagogy that takes seriously the socially dependent nature of human persons. The social account of language proposed in the later Wittgenstein suggests that the meaning of concepts arises amongst pre-linguistic, embodied, communal practices. Theological language cannot be detached from its concrete expressions in the world because its meaning is dependent upon a communal form of life in which those concepts make sense. James K. A. Smith builds upon this pragmatist tradition to present a theory of doctrine and preaching grounded in liturgical practices that does justice to human physicality and characterizes all human practices, religious or otherwise, as structures of habitual formation with particular teloi. The Gospel, then, is not just a truth we learn to believe but a way of life that we come to embody contra competing “cultural liturgies.”
传福音和活出福音之间的关系是什么?在那些试图一起活出福音的人的日常习惯中,讲道变得容易理解和适用。光是正确的讲道,并不能使人在生活上反映圣经的教导。本文将维特根斯坦的语言哲学和史密斯的神学人类学结合起来,以发展一种重视人的社会依赖性质的情感教育学。后期维特根斯坦提出的语言的社会解释表明,概念的意义产生于前语言的、具体化的、共同的实践中。神学语言不能脱离它在世界上的具体表达,因为它的意义依赖于一种共同的生活形式,在这种生活形式中,这些概念是有意义的。詹姆斯·k·a·史密斯(James K. a . Smith)在这种实用主义传统的基础上,提出了一种基于礼仪实践的教义和讲道理论,这种理论公正地对待人类的肉体,并将所有人类实践,无论是宗教的还是其他的,都描述为具有特定目的的习惯形成结构。因此,福音不仅是我们学会相信的真理,而且是一种生活方式,我们将其体现在与之竞争的“文化礼仪”中。