3-Way game model for privacy-preserving cybersecurity information exchange framework

Iman Vakilinia, Deepak K. Tosh, S. Sengupta
{"title":"3-Way game model for privacy-preserving cybersecurity information exchange framework","authors":"Iman Vakilinia, Deepak K. Tosh, S. Sengupta","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.2017.8170842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the growing number of cyberattack incidents, organizations are required to have proactive knowledge on the cybersecurity landscape for efficiently defending their resources. To achieve this, organizations must develop the culture of sharing their threat information with others for effectively assessing the associated risks. However, sharing cybersecurity information is costly for the organizations due to the fact that the information conveys sensitive and private data. Hence, making the decision for sharing information is a challenging task and requires to resolve the trade-off between sharing advantages and privacy exposure. On the other hand, cybersecurity information exchange (CYBEX) management is crucial in stabilizing the system through setting the correct values for participation fees and sharing incentives. In this work, we model the interaction of organizations, CYBEX, and attackers involved in a sharing system using dynamic game. With devising appropriate payoff models for each player, we analyze the best strategies of the entities by incorporating the organizations' privacy component in the sharing model. Using the best response analysis, the simulation results demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed framework.","PeriodicalId":113767,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2017.8170842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

With the growing number of cyberattack incidents, organizations are required to have proactive knowledge on the cybersecurity landscape for efficiently defending their resources. To achieve this, organizations must develop the culture of sharing their threat information with others for effectively assessing the associated risks. However, sharing cybersecurity information is costly for the organizations due to the fact that the information conveys sensitive and private data. Hence, making the decision for sharing information is a challenging task and requires to resolve the trade-off between sharing advantages and privacy exposure. On the other hand, cybersecurity information exchange (CYBEX) management is crucial in stabilizing the system through setting the correct values for participation fees and sharing incentives. In this work, we model the interaction of organizations, CYBEX, and attackers involved in a sharing system using dynamic game. With devising appropriate payoff models for each player, we analyze the best strategies of the entities by incorporating the organizations' privacy component in the sharing model. Using the best response analysis, the simulation results demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed framework.
保密性网络安全信息交换框架的三向博弈模型
随着网络攻击事件的不断增加,组织需要对网络安全领域有积极的了解,以有效地保护他们的资源。为了实现这一目标,组织必须发展与他人共享威胁信息的文化,以有效地评估相关风险。然而,共享网络安全信息对于组织来说是昂贵的,因为这些信息传递了敏感和私人数据。因此,决定是否共享信息是一项具有挑战性的任务,需要解决共享优势和隐私暴露之间的权衡。另一方面,网络安全信息交换(CYBEX)管理通过设定正确的参与费和共享激励值,对稳定系统至关重要。在这项工作中,我们采用动态博弈的方法模拟了共享系统中组织、CYBEX和攻击者之间的互动。通过为每个参与者设计合适的收益模型,将组织的隐私成分纳入共享模型,分析了实体的最佳策略。通过最佳响应分析,仿真结果验证了所提框架的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信