Perimeter intruder detection systems performance standard

D. Armstrong, C. Peile
{"title":"Perimeter intruder detection systems performance standard","authors":"D. Armstrong, C. Peile","doi":"10.1109/CCST.2005.1594845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper includes discussion of the main high level principles upon which the development of the standards is based. These are: impartiality; objectivity; reproducibility (precision by other organisations); repeatability (precision by the same tester); validity and, of course, accuracy. A comparison is made between application and technology specific based testing in order to demonstrate why the former is most suited to the PIDS performance standard. The paper then addresses the key characteristics of a PIDS (false alarm rate, detection rate, and vulnerability to defeat) and suggest how these could be assessed as part of a general evaluation methodology in order to give the end user the required level of information. Finally, an update on the progress of the drafting of the standard is given","PeriodicalId":411051,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 39th Annual 2005 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 39th Annual 2005 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2005.1594845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper includes discussion of the main high level principles upon which the development of the standards is based. These are: impartiality; objectivity; reproducibility (precision by other organisations); repeatability (precision by the same tester); validity and, of course, accuracy. A comparison is made between application and technology specific based testing in order to demonstrate why the former is most suited to the PIDS performance standard. The paper then addresses the key characteristics of a PIDS (false alarm rate, detection rate, and vulnerability to defeat) and suggest how these could be assessed as part of a general evaluation methodology in order to give the end user the required level of information. Finally, an update on the progress of the drafting of the standard is given
周边入侵者检测系统性能标准
本文包括对标准开发所基于的主要高级原则的讨论。它们是:公正;客观性;再现性(其他组织的精确性);重复性(同一台测试仪的精度);有效性,当然还有准确性。为了证明为什么前者最适合pid性能标准,对基于应用程序和特定技术的测试进行了比较。然后,本文讨论了pid的关键特征(误报率、检测率和失败脆弱性),并建议如何将这些特征作为一般评估方法的一部分进行评估,以便为最终用户提供所需的信息水平。最后,给出了标准起草进展的最新情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信