Jensen's views on intelligence and a pre‐empirical image of man

J. Smolicz
{"title":"Jensen's views on intelligence and a pre‐empirical image of man","authors":"J. Smolicz","doi":"10.1080/17508480609556435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional definition of equality of opportunity in education has rested on a tacit assumption that intelligence is like some Aristotelian quality of which each individual possesses a fixed quantity that remains constant through life. It was also assumed that this special quintessence could be distilled in its pure form and in its entirety (irrespective of the social origins of the individual) by the application of scientifically structured tests designed according to advanced theories in psychology. These assumptions remained unchallenged for so long because they represented what appeared to be a breakthrough in achieving scientific objectivity in areas which had previously remained in the shadow of the mystery of man's nature. The stress on objectivity led to the further assumption that such tests and theories were valuefree.","PeriodicalId":347655,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Studies in Education","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508480609556435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The traditional definition of equality of opportunity in education has rested on a tacit assumption that intelligence is like some Aristotelian quality of which each individual possesses a fixed quantity that remains constant through life. It was also assumed that this special quintessence could be distilled in its pure form and in its entirety (irrespective of the social origins of the individual) by the application of scientifically structured tests designed according to advanced theories in psychology. These assumptions remained unchallenged for so long because they represented what appeared to be a breakthrough in achieving scientific objectivity in areas which had previously remained in the shadow of the mystery of man's nature. The stress on objectivity led to the further assumption that such tests and theories were valuefree.
简森关于智力的观点和前经验的人的形象
教育机会均等的传统定义是建立在一个默认的假设上的,即智力就像亚里士多德所说的某种品质,每个人都拥有固定的数量,并在一生中保持不变。还有一种假设是,这种特殊的精华可以通过应用根据心理学先进理论设计的科学结构测试,以其纯粹的形式和整体(无论个人的社会起源如何)进行提炼。这些假设在很长一段时间内都没有受到挑战,因为它们代表了在实现科学客观性方面的突破,而这些领域以前一直处于人类本性神秘的阴影之下。对客观性的强调导致了进一步的假设,即这些测试和理论是没有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信