Reexamining the Echo Chamber Effect of COVID-19 Vaccine Videos on YouTube

Tianlun Zhou, Paolo Mengoni
{"title":"Reexamining the Echo Chamber Effect of COVID-19 Vaccine Videos on YouTube","authors":"Tianlun Zhou, Paolo Mengoni","doi":"10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has been going on for more than two years. Vaccination is believed to be one of the most efficient ways to achieve herd immunity and end pandemic. However, the contents about COVID-19 vaccines on social media have impacts on personal attitude towards vaccination. The present study aims to examine the current scenario and the echo chamber effect of COVID-19 vaccine videos on YouTube. A total of 1,646 videos with comments and replies were identified. An approach combining topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and social network analysis was employed to explore users’ attitude towards COVID-19 vaccines and whether the echo chamber effect existed. The results indicate that, even if the misleading and anti-vaccination videos were removed by the platform, \"anti-vaccination\" contents still widely appear in the comments. Moreover, the community of \"anti-vaccination\" users was more homogeneous compared with that of \"pro-vaccination\" users. The findings of this study advanced theories of echo chamber effect and the network perspective to examine echo chambers. We propose that should be paid more attention ideology echo chamber, compared with exposure echo chamber.","PeriodicalId":345445,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has been going on for more than two years. Vaccination is believed to be one of the most efficient ways to achieve herd immunity and end pandemic. However, the contents about COVID-19 vaccines on social media have impacts on personal attitude towards vaccination. The present study aims to examine the current scenario and the echo chamber effect of COVID-19 vaccine videos on YouTube. A total of 1,646 videos with comments and replies were identified. An approach combining topic modeling, sentiment analysis, and social network analysis was employed to explore users’ attitude towards COVID-19 vaccines and whether the echo chamber effect existed. The results indicate that, even if the misleading and anti-vaccination videos were removed by the platform, "anti-vaccination" contents still widely appear in the comments. Moreover, the community of "anti-vaccination" users was more homogeneous compared with that of "pro-vaccination" users. The findings of this study advanced theories of echo chamber effect and the network perspective to examine echo chambers. We propose that should be paid more attention ideology echo chamber, compared with exposure echo chamber.
重新审视YouTube上COVID-19疫苗视频的回声室效应
新冠肺炎大流行已经持续了两年多。疫苗接种被认为是实现群体免疫和结束大流行的最有效方法之一。然而,社交媒体上关于COVID-19疫苗的内容会影响个人对疫苗接种的态度。本研究旨在研究YouTube上COVID-19疫苗视频的现状和回音室效应。共有1646个带有评论和回复的视频被识别出来。采用话题建模、情感分析和社会网络分析相结合的方法,探讨用户对COVID-19疫苗的态度以及回声室效应是否存在。结果表明,即使平台删除了误导和反疫苗的视频,“反疫苗”内容仍然广泛出现在评论中。此外,与支持接种疫苗的用户相比,“反对接种疫苗”的用户社区更加均匀。本研究的发现提出了回声室效应的理论和网络视角来研究回声室。我们建议应更加重视意识形态回声室,而不是暴露回声室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信