Design and learnability of vortex whistles for managing chronic lung function via smartphones

Spencer A. Kaiser, Ashley Parks, Patrick Leopard, Charlie A. Albright, Jake Carlson, Mayank Goel, Damoun Nassehi, Eric C. Larson
{"title":"Design and learnability of vortex whistles for managing chronic lung function via smartphones","authors":"Spencer A. Kaiser, Ashley Parks, Patrick Leopard, Charlie A. Albright, Jake Carlson, Mayank Goel, Damoun Nassehi, Eric C. Larson","doi":"10.1145/2971648.2971726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spirometry is the gold standard for managing and diagnosing obstructive lung diseases. Clinical spirometers, however, are expensive and have limited portability. Vortex whistles have shown promise as a potential substitute for clinical spirometers. While vortex whistles are low-cost and are highly portable, only a subset of common spirometry measurements can be measured reliably. Moreover, no research studies have evaluated characteristics of human interaction with vortex whistles, such as maneuver learnability and mental effort. We present a modified 3D-printed vortex whistle design that enables estimation of spirometry measures not previously attainable with traditional vortex whistles. We evaluate the whistle using a pulmonary waveform generator (a commercial standard) and map parameters of the whistle construction to spirometry test endpoints. Through a human subjects trial we evaluate how to personalize whistle parameters for different subjects and assess cognitive workload while using a vortex whistle. We show that, with personalization, vortex whistles are as effective as clinical spirometers for identifying moderate airway obstruction and require similar cognitive load to use.","PeriodicalId":303792,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Spirometry is the gold standard for managing and diagnosing obstructive lung diseases. Clinical spirometers, however, are expensive and have limited portability. Vortex whistles have shown promise as a potential substitute for clinical spirometers. While vortex whistles are low-cost and are highly portable, only a subset of common spirometry measurements can be measured reliably. Moreover, no research studies have evaluated characteristics of human interaction with vortex whistles, such as maneuver learnability and mental effort. We present a modified 3D-printed vortex whistle design that enables estimation of spirometry measures not previously attainable with traditional vortex whistles. We evaluate the whistle using a pulmonary waveform generator (a commercial standard) and map parameters of the whistle construction to spirometry test endpoints. Through a human subjects trial we evaluate how to personalize whistle parameters for different subjects and assess cognitive workload while using a vortex whistle. We show that, with personalization, vortex whistles are as effective as clinical spirometers for identifying moderate airway obstruction and require similar cognitive load to use.
通过智能手机管理慢性肺功能的漩涡哨声的设计和可学习性
肺量测定法是管理和诊断阻塞性肺疾病的金标准。然而,临床肺活量计价格昂贵且便携性有限。涡旋口哨器作为临床肺活量计的潜在替代品已显示出前景。虽然涡旋口哨器成本低,便携性高,但只有一部分常见的肺活量测量方法可以可靠地测量。此外,还没有研究评估人类与旋涡口哨互动的特征,如机动易学性和脑力努力。我们提出了一个改进的3d打印涡流哨子设计,使肺活量测量的估计以前无法实现与传统的涡流哨子。我们使用肺波形发生器(商业标准)评估哨子,并将哨子结构的参数映射到肺活量测定测试终点。通过一项人体试验,我们评估了如何为不同的受试者个性化口哨参数,并评估了使用涡流口哨时的认知负荷。我们表明,通过个性化,涡流哨子与临床肺活量计一样有效,用于识别中度气道阻塞,并且需要相似的认知负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信