A systematic map of within-plantation oil palm management practices reveals a rapidly growing but patchy evidence base

Megan Popkin, V. J. Reiss-Woolever, E. Turner, S. Luke
{"title":"A systematic map of within-plantation oil palm management practices reveals a rapidly growing but patchy evidence base","authors":"Megan Popkin, V. J. Reiss-Woolever, E. Turner, S. Luke","doi":"10.1371/journal.pstr.0000023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although oil palm expansion has had severe environmental impacts, oil palm also has the highest yield per hectare of any vegetable oil crop. Compared to many other crops, it has the potential to support high complexity habitats, with minimal chemical input, and relatively high levels of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. However, there has been little synthesis of available research on oil palm management strategies to support delivery of more sustainable cultivation. In this paper, we provide a systematic map compiling all available evidence assessing within-plantation oil palm management practices at the cultivation stage, with a focus on practices that affect biodiversity and environmental processes. Using approaches adapted from systematic review protocols, we catalogued oil palm management publications to provide details of geographic location, year, interventions tested (i.e. agricultural practices), targeted outcomes of interventions, co-occurrences between different interventions and outcomes (including multiple outcomes), and study design. Most studies were conducted in Southeast Asia, with fewer studies conducted in South America or Africa. Twenty-six interventions were observed in the literature, across six categories: soil, understory, within-crop, landscape-level, replanting, and mixed/multiple interventions. The most common interventions tested were landscape-scale interventions, such as maintaining forest fragments/buffer zones, whereas interventions involved in replanting were the least researched. Eight outcomes were considered: soil fertility, soil erosion, water quality and availability, pest control, replanting, maintenance of biodiversity and areas of high conservation value, and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Studies researching biodiversity were the most common, whereas comparatively few studies considered replanting and reducing emissions. Most primary studies were observational, with experimental studies being rarer, especially in biodiversity research. We match our findings to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s environmental sustainability criteria to illustrate how policy-makers and producers may use our map to access evidence supporting cultivation-stage oil palm sustainability management. This study provides valuable information to inform best management practices and direction for necessary future research.","PeriodicalId":384293,"journal":{"name":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although oil palm expansion has had severe environmental impacts, oil palm also has the highest yield per hectare of any vegetable oil crop. Compared to many other crops, it has the potential to support high complexity habitats, with minimal chemical input, and relatively high levels of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. However, there has been little synthesis of available research on oil palm management strategies to support delivery of more sustainable cultivation. In this paper, we provide a systematic map compiling all available evidence assessing within-plantation oil palm management practices at the cultivation stage, with a focus on practices that affect biodiversity and environmental processes. Using approaches adapted from systematic review protocols, we catalogued oil palm management publications to provide details of geographic location, year, interventions tested (i.e. agricultural practices), targeted outcomes of interventions, co-occurrences between different interventions and outcomes (including multiple outcomes), and study design. Most studies were conducted in Southeast Asia, with fewer studies conducted in South America or Africa. Twenty-six interventions were observed in the literature, across six categories: soil, understory, within-crop, landscape-level, replanting, and mixed/multiple interventions. The most common interventions tested were landscape-scale interventions, such as maintaining forest fragments/buffer zones, whereas interventions involved in replanting were the least researched. Eight outcomes were considered: soil fertility, soil erosion, water quality and availability, pest control, replanting, maintenance of biodiversity and areas of high conservation value, and reducing air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Studies researching biodiversity were the most common, whereas comparatively few studies considered replanting and reducing emissions. Most primary studies were observational, with experimental studies being rarer, especially in biodiversity research. We match our findings to the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil’s environmental sustainability criteria to illustrate how policy-makers and producers may use our map to access evidence supporting cultivation-stage oil palm sustainability management. This study provides valuable information to inform best management practices and direction for necessary future research.
种植园内油棕管理实践的系统地图揭示了一个快速增长但不完整的证据基础
尽管油棕的扩张对环境造成了严重的影响,但油棕也是所有植物油作物中每公顷产量最高的。与许多其他作物相比,它有可能支持高度复杂的栖息地,化学投入最少,生物多样性和生态系统功能相对较高。然而,很少有关于油棕管理策略的综合研究,以支持提供更可持续的种植。在本文中,我们提供了一个系统的地图,收集了所有现有的证据,评估种植阶段的人工林内油棕管理实践,重点关注影响生物多样性和环境过程的实践。采用系统评价方案改编的方法,我们对油棕管理出版物进行了编目,以提供地理位置、年份、测试的干预措施(即农业实践)、干预措施的目标结果、不同干预措施和结果(包括多种结果)之间的共现情况以及研究设计的详细信息。大多数研究是在东南亚进行的,在南美洲或非洲进行的研究较少。在文献中观察到26种干预措施,分为6类:土壤、林下植被、作物内、景观水平、补种和混合/多重干预。所测试的最常见的干预措施是景观规模的干预措施,例如维持森林碎片/缓冲区,而涉及重新种植的干预措施的研究最少。考虑了八项结果:土壤肥力、土壤侵蚀、水质和可用性、害虫防治、补种、维持生物多样性和高保护价值地区、减少空气污染和温室气体排放。研究生物多样性的研究是最常见的,而考虑重新种植和减少排放的研究相对较少。大多数初步研究是观察性的,实验研究较少,特别是在生物多样性研究中。我们将我们的发现与可持续棕榈油圆桌会议的环境可持续性标准相匹配,以说明政策制定者和生产者如何使用我们的地图来获取支持种植阶段油棕可持续性管理的证据。本研究提供了有价值的信息,为未来必要的研究提供了最佳管理实践和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信