Robustness of Smooth Sliding Control to Unmodeled Dynamics: Overcoming First-Order SMC and Super-Twisting Algorithm

T. R. Oliveira, L. Hsu
{"title":"Robustness of Smooth Sliding Control to Unmodeled Dynamics: Overcoming First-Order SMC and Super-Twisting Algorithm","authors":"T. R. Oliveira, L. Hsu","doi":"10.1109/VSS.2018.8460343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we revisit the earlier smooth sliding control (SSC) by presenting the design and an alternative approach to analyze its robustness with respect to unmodeled dynamics. The control approach relies on some appropriate prediction error and a filtered control signal to obtain a smooth output-feedback based on first-order sliding mode control law for chattering avoidance. Global exponentially stability with respect to a small compact residual set, practical trajectory tracking and ideal sliding modes are guaranteed by means of a small-gain analysis, even in the presence of adverse parasitic dynamics. Comparison results discuss to what extent the modified SSC architecture may serve as an alternative to classical first-order sliding modes (FOSM) and super-twisting algorithm (STA). In fact, simulations show that SSC outperforms FOSM and STA for the same numerical examples recently used in the lively debate between continuous and discontinuous sliding mode control options for chattering alleviation. The main purpose here is to stir new research about robustness improvements in both classical and on higher-order sliding mode algorithms.","PeriodicalId":127777,"journal":{"name":"2018 15th International Workshop on Variable Structure Systems (VSS)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 15th International Workshop on Variable Structure Systems (VSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VSS.2018.8460343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this paper we revisit the earlier smooth sliding control (SSC) by presenting the design and an alternative approach to analyze its robustness with respect to unmodeled dynamics. The control approach relies on some appropriate prediction error and a filtered control signal to obtain a smooth output-feedback based on first-order sliding mode control law for chattering avoidance. Global exponentially stability with respect to a small compact residual set, practical trajectory tracking and ideal sliding modes are guaranteed by means of a small-gain analysis, even in the presence of adverse parasitic dynamics. Comparison results discuss to what extent the modified SSC architecture may serve as an alternative to classical first-order sliding modes (FOSM) and super-twisting algorithm (STA). In fact, simulations show that SSC outperforms FOSM and STA for the same numerical examples recently used in the lively debate between continuous and discontinuous sliding mode control options for chattering alleviation. The main purpose here is to stir new research about robustness improvements in both classical and on higher-order sliding mode algorithms.
光滑滑动控制对未建模动力学的鲁棒性:克服一阶SMC和超扭转算法
在本文中,我们通过提出设计和一种替代方法来分析其相对于未建模动力学的鲁棒性,重新审视早期的平滑滑动控制(SSC)。该控制方法基于一阶滑模控制律,通过适当的预测误差和滤波后的控制信号获得平滑的输出反馈以避免抖振。通过小增益分析,即使存在不利的寄生动力学,也能保证相对于一个小的紧致残差集的全局指数稳定性、实际的轨迹跟踪和理想的滑动模态。比较结果讨论了改进的SSC结构在多大程度上可以替代经典的一阶滑模(FOSM)和超扭转算法(STA)。事实上,模拟表明,对于最近在连续和不连续滑模控制方案之间的激烈辩论中使用的相同数值示例,SSC优于FOSM和STA。本文的主要目的是激发关于经典和高阶滑模算法鲁棒性改进的新研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信