A Performance Study of Epoch-based Commit Protocols in Distributed OLTP Databases

Jack Waudby, P. Ezhilchelvan, I. Mitrani, J. Webber
{"title":"A Performance Study of Epoch-based Commit Protocols in Distributed OLTP Databases","authors":"Jack Waudby, P. Ezhilchelvan, I. Mitrani, J. Webber","doi":"10.1109/SRDS55811.2022.00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed OLTP systems execute the high-overhead, two-phase commit (2PC) protocol at the end of every distributed transaction. Epoch-based commit proposes that 2PC be executed only once for all transactions processed within a time interval called an epoch. Increasing epoch duration allows more transactions to be processed before the common 2PC. It thus reduces 2PC overhead per transaction, increases throughput but also increases average transaction latency. Therefore, required is the ability to choose the right epoch size that offers the desired trade-off between throughput and latency. To this end, we develop two analytical models to estimate throughput and average latency in terms of epoch size taking into account load and failure conditions. Simulations affirm their accuracy and effectiveness. We then present epoch-based multi-commit which, unlike epoch-based commit, seeks to avoid all transactions being aborted when failures occur, and also performs identically when failures do not occur. Our performance study identifies workload factors that make it more effective in preventing transaction aborts and concludes that the analytical models can be equally useful in predicting its performance as well.","PeriodicalId":143115,"journal":{"name":"2022 41st International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 41st International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SRDS55811.2022.00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Distributed OLTP systems execute the high-overhead, two-phase commit (2PC) protocol at the end of every distributed transaction. Epoch-based commit proposes that 2PC be executed only once for all transactions processed within a time interval called an epoch. Increasing epoch duration allows more transactions to be processed before the common 2PC. It thus reduces 2PC overhead per transaction, increases throughput but also increases average transaction latency. Therefore, required is the ability to choose the right epoch size that offers the desired trade-off between throughput and latency. To this end, we develop two analytical models to estimate throughput and average latency in terms of epoch size taking into account load and failure conditions. Simulations affirm their accuracy and effectiveness. We then present epoch-based multi-commit which, unlike epoch-based commit, seeks to avoid all transactions being aborted when failures occur, and also performs identically when failures do not occur. Our performance study identifies workload factors that make it more effective in preventing transaction aborts and concludes that the analytical models can be equally useful in predicting its performance as well.
分布式OLTP数据库中基于时代的提交协议性能研究
分布式OLTP系统在每个分布式事务结束时执行高开销的两阶段提交(2PC)协议。基于epoch的提交建议,对于在称为epoch的时间间隔内处理的所有事务,只执行2PC一次。增加epoch持续时间允许在公共2PC之前处理更多事务。因此,它减少了每个事务的2PC开销,提高了吞吐量,但也增加了平均事务延迟。因此,需要能够选择正确的epoch大小,从而在吞吐量和延迟之间提供所需的权衡。为此,我们开发了两个分析模型,以考虑负载和故障条件的epoch大小来估计吞吐量和平均延迟。仿真验证了其准确性和有效性。然后,我们提出了基于时间点的多提交,它与基于时间点的提交不同,它寻求避免在发生失败时中止所有事务,并且在没有发生失败时也执行相同的事务。我们的性能研究确定了使其在防止事务中止方面更有效的工作负载因素,并得出结论,分析模型在预测其性能方面也同样有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信