CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: RELATIONSHIPS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES

Tetiana Botsian
{"title":"CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: RELATIONSHIPS IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES","authors":"Tetiana Botsian","doi":"10.35433/issn2410-3748-2019-2(25)-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to examine literature about relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance (CFP) in different countries. The studies from nine different countries were examined. The results indicate that there are three groups of results. Three different types of relationships between CSR and CFP can be identified: positive, negative and neutral. We claim, that researchers of 9 different countries use quite the same methodology to different to examine the relation between CSR and CFP for different types of companies. However, CSR is strongly influenced by cultural and socio-economic environments and relates to a country’s national business system. Political institutions are potential drivers of CSR as well. Moreover, informal institutions such as national cultures have an important effect on CSR practices. The national business system of the specific country creates the conditions under which corporations are more or less likely to engage in socially responsible behavior. For instance, in countries with a high degree of union power, firms perform better on the social and environmental scores. So, variety of legislative basis and national institutions (political, market, cultural) are drivers of CSR. They is a specific for each country. Due to that, all examined studies are incomparable because of the national institutions’ difference that drive responsible behavior of the companies. The results in one country can differ in another. This article adds to the previous research devoted to the relationship between CSR and CFP. Firstly, the study enhances understanding of the relationship between CSR and CFP. Secondly, this study expands information about CSR in different countries to scholars and researchers. It also contributes to investors, who consider CSR in decisions making process.","PeriodicalId":286389,"journal":{"name":"Economics. Management. Innovations","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics. Management. Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35433/issn2410-3748-2019-2(25)-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to examine literature about relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance (CFP) in different countries. The studies from nine different countries were examined. The results indicate that there are three groups of results. Three different types of relationships between CSR and CFP can be identified: positive, negative and neutral. We claim, that researchers of 9 different countries use quite the same methodology to different to examine the relation between CSR and CFP for different types of companies. However, CSR is strongly influenced by cultural and socio-economic environments and relates to a country’s national business system. Political institutions are potential drivers of CSR as well. Moreover, informal institutions such as national cultures have an important effect on CSR practices. The national business system of the specific country creates the conditions under which corporations are more or less likely to engage in socially responsible behavior. For instance, in countries with a high degree of union power, firms perform better on the social and environmental scores. So, variety of legislative basis and national institutions (political, market, cultural) are drivers of CSR. They is a specific for each country. Due to that, all examined studies are incomparable because of the national institutions’ difference that drive responsible behavior of the companies. The results in one country can differ in another. This article adds to the previous research devoted to the relationship between CSR and CFP. Firstly, the study enhances understanding of the relationship between CSR and CFP. Secondly, this study expands information about CSR in different countries to scholars and researchers. It also contributes to investors, who consider CSR in decisions making process.
企业社会责任与企业财务绩效:不同国家的关系
本研究旨在考察不同国家关于企业社会责任(CSR)与财务绩效(CFP)之间关系的文献。研究考察了九个不同国家的研究。结果表明有三组结果。企业社会责任与财务业绩之间存在三种不同类型的关系:积极、消极和中性。我们认为,9 个不同国家的研究人员在研究不同类型公司的企业社会责任与 CFP 之间的关系时,使用了完全相同的方法。然而,企业社会责任受到文化和社会经济环境的强烈影响,并与一个国家的国家商业体系有关。政治体制也是企业社会责任的潜在驱动因素。此外,国家文化等非正式制度对企业社会责任实践也有重要影响。特定国家的国家商业体系创造了企业更有可能或更不可能参与社会责任行为的条件。例如,在工会力量强大的国家,企业在社会和环境方面的表现更好。因此,各种立法基础和国家制度(政治、市场、文化)是企业社会责任的驱动力。它们对每个国家来说都是特定的。正因为如此,所有的研究都是不可比的,因为国家机构的不同会推动企业的责任行为。一个国家的研究结果可能与另一个国家不同。本文是对以往有关企业社会责任与 CFP 关系研究的补充。首先,本研究加深了对企业社会责任与 CFP 关系的理解。其次,本研究为学者和研究人员提供了有关不同国家企业社会责任的更多信息。它还有助于投资者在决策过程中考虑企业社会责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信