A. Henkel, S. Böschen, N. Drews, Louisa A. Firnenburg, B. Görgen, Matthias Grundmann, Nico Lüdtke, Thomas Pfister, Simon Rödder, Björn Wendt
{"title":"Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit – Herausforderungen und Perspektiven","authors":"A. Henkel, S. Böschen, N. Drews, Louisa A. Firnenburg, B. Görgen, Matthias Grundmann, Nico Lüdtke, Thomas Pfister, Simon Rödder, Björn Wendt","doi":"10.1515/9783839451991-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proceeds on the assumption that a specifically sociological perspective is lacking in the discourse on sustainability. However, especially in view of the diversity of this dis-course, a “sociology of sustainability” may offer new insights by contributing different per-spectives and critically reflecting on the implicit premises of the sustainability debate. A spe-cific challenge for sociology is to position itself with regard to the problem-orientation as well as the normative character of sustainability. This contribution proposes to consider the per-spective-rich diversity of sociology as a strength, which, as it applies to the parallel diversity of sustainability, can be made very productive. Sociological approaches applicable to the sus-tainability debate are those that bear upon the simultaneity of observation and orientation of transformation – whether with an area-specific or societal-theoretical focus – and arrive at thoroughly plural mediation proposals. This paper introduces five such proposals as explora-tory examples for a sociology of sustainability: doing sustainability, a field theoretical analy-sis, a contribution from the sociology of science, epistemic governance and a societal-theoretical reflection. We understand this as a prelude to a discussion regarding the coming sociology of sustainability.","PeriodicalId":277833,"journal":{"name":"Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839451991-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
This paper proceeds on the assumption that a specifically sociological perspective is lacking in the discourse on sustainability. However, especially in view of the diversity of this dis-course, a “sociology of sustainability” may offer new insights by contributing different per-spectives and critically reflecting on the implicit premises of the sustainability debate. A spe-cific challenge for sociology is to position itself with regard to the problem-orientation as well as the normative character of sustainability. This contribution proposes to consider the per-spective-rich diversity of sociology as a strength, which, as it applies to the parallel diversity of sustainability, can be made very productive. Sociological approaches applicable to the sus-tainability debate are those that bear upon the simultaneity of observation and orientation of transformation – whether with an area-specific or societal-theoretical focus – and arrive at thoroughly plural mediation proposals. This paper introduces five such proposals as explora-tory examples for a sociology of sustainability: doing sustainability, a field theoretical analy-sis, a contribution from the sociology of science, epistemic governance and a societal-theoretical reflection. We understand this as a prelude to a discussion regarding the coming sociology of sustainability.