MENAKAR PROGRESIVITAS TEKNOLOGI FINANSIAL (FINTECH) DALAM HUKUM BISNIS DI INDONESIA

Mariske Myeke Tampi
{"title":"MENAKAR PROGRESIVITAS TEKNOLOGI FINANSIAL (FINTECH) DALAM HUKUM BISNIS DI INDONESIA","authors":"Mariske Myeke Tampi","doi":"10.24912/ERAHUKUM.V16I2.4529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The PBI Number 19/12/PBI/2017 concerning the Implementation of Financial Technology is a staple of policy that shows the Financial Technology (Fintech) has been allowed to exist in Business Law in Indonesia such as business to business and business to consumer with particular limitation. The regulation on electronic money that has been enacted before the issuance of PBI Number 19/12/PBI/2017 is also included in the definition of Financial Technology (Fintech) in PBI Number 19/12/PBI/2017. Enormous benefits from Financial Technology (Fintech) is a driving force of the progressivity of the Financial Technology (Fintech) regulation. Review of laws relating to Financial Technology (Fintech) in Indonesia illustrates that the policy of Financial Technology (Fintech) is quite progressive. Such progressivity may be examined from the view point of Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive law theory and Roscoe Pound’s sociological jurisprudence. The cause of the emergence of rules regarding current Financial Technology (ius constitutum) is contained in 4 points of urgency and 3 (three) points of consideration of Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 19/12/ PBI/2017. As long as the product of Financial Technology does not conflict with the existing value system, the Financial Technology product can be developed and regulated in Indonesia in the future (ius constituendum).","PeriodicalId":241921,"journal":{"name":"Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/ERAHUKUM.V16I2.4529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The PBI Number 19/12/PBI/2017 concerning the Implementation of Financial Technology is a staple of policy that shows the Financial Technology (Fintech) has been allowed to exist in Business Law in Indonesia such as business to business and business to consumer with particular limitation. The regulation on electronic money that has been enacted before the issuance of PBI Number 19/12/PBI/2017 is also included in the definition of Financial Technology (Fintech) in PBI Number 19/12/PBI/2017. Enormous benefits from Financial Technology (Fintech) is a driving force of the progressivity of the Financial Technology (Fintech) regulation. Review of laws relating to Financial Technology (Fintech) in Indonesia illustrates that the policy of Financial Technology (Fintech) is quite progressive. Such progressivity may be examined from the view point of Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive law theory and Roscoe Pound’s sociological jurisprudence. The cause of the emergence of rules regarding current Financial Technology (ius constitutum) is contained in 4 points of urgency and 3 (three) points of consideration of Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 19/12/ PBI/2017. As long as the product of Financial Technology does not conflict with the existing value system, the Financial Technology product can be developed and regulated in Indonesia in the future (ius constituendum).
衡量印尼商业法律金融技术的进步
关于金融技术实施的PBI号19/12/PBI/2017是一项主要政策,表明金融技术(Fintech)已被允许存在于印度尼西亚的商业法中,例如企业对企业和企业对消费者,但有特定限制。在PBI号19/12/PBI/2017发布之前已经颁布的关于电子货币的规定也包含在PBI号19/12/PBI/2017中对金融技术(Fintech)的定义中。金融技术(Fintech)带来的巨大利益是金融技术(Fintech)监管渐进式发展的推动力。对印度尼西亚金融技术(Fintech)相关法律的审查表明,金融技术(Fintech)的政策是相当进步的。这种进步性可以从拉哈德霍的进步法学理论和庞德的社会学法学的角度来考察。关于当前金融技术(ius constitutum)规则出现的原因包含在印度尼西亚银行第19/12/ PBI/2017号法规的4个紧迫性点和3个考虑点中。只要金融科技的产品不与现有的价值体系发生冲突,未来金融科技产品就可以在印尼进行开发和监管(ius constituatum)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信