Legal Protection For Consumers Of Product Warranty In Business Law

N. Posumah
{"title":"Legal Protection For Consumers Of Product Warranty In Business Law","authors":"N. Posumah","doi":"10.55809/tora.v8i2.140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In article 30 of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection expressly regulates the authority to supervise business actors carried out by the government, the community, and the Non- Governmental Consumer Protection Institute (LPMSM), but the facts on the ground consumers still get product guarantees from business actors that are not in accordance with Law No .8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This shows that there has been an imbalance between regulations and facts on the ground. The problem in this study is how consumer protection against product warranties in business law and what are the consequences of warranties that are not in accordance with Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This research method uses a normative juridical approach, with secondary data collection, to prove the consequences of guarantees that are not in accordance with Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively. Based on the results of the study it was found that many losses experienced by consumers related to guarantees, such as fraud against store guarantees, fraud against bank guarantees, and others. Therefore, the government provides guarantees for the protection of consumers against product warranties through government regulations, one of which is the UUPK. In its implementation, consumer protection has not been carried out to the fullest, this is proven because there are still many irregularities and losses felt by the government. Whereas in the UUPK the sanctions/consequences received by the business actor if committing a violation related to goods will be subject to criminal acts.","PeriodicalId":355257,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum to-ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur dan Melindungi Masyarakat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v8i2.140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In article 30 of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection expressly regulates the authority to supervise business actors carried out by the government, the community, and the Non- Governmental Consumer Protection Institute (LPMSM), but the facts on the ground consumers still get product guarantees from business actors that are not in accordance with Law No .8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This shows that there has been an imbalance between regulations and facts on the ground. The problem in this study is how consumer protection against product warranties in business law and what are the consequences of warranties that are not in accordance with Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This research method uses a normative juridical approach, with secondary data collection, to prove the consequences of guarantees that are not in accordance with Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The data obtained were analyzed qualitatively. Based on the results of the study it was found that many losses experienced by consumers related to guarantees, such as fraud against store guarantees, fraud against bank guarantees, and others. Therefore, the government provides guarantees for the protection of consumers against product warranties through government regulations, one of which is the UUPK. In its implementation, consumer protection has not been carried out to the fullest, this is proven because there are still many irregularities and losses felt by the government. Whereas in the UUPK the sanctions/consequences received by the business actor if committing a violation related to goods will be subject to criminal acts.
商法中产品保证对消费者的法律保护
1999年关于消费者保护的第8号法律第30条明确规定了监督政府、社区和非政府消费者保护协会(LPMSM)开展的商业行为者的权力,但实际情况是,消费者仍然从商业行为者那里获得不符合1999年关于消费者保护的第8号法律的产品保证。这表明法规与实际情况之间存在不平衡。本研究的问题是如何在商业法中保护消费者免受产品保证的侵害,以及不符合1999年关于消费者保护的第8号法的保证的后果是什么。该研究方法采用规范性的司法方法,并收集辅助数据,以证明不符合1999年关于保护消费者的第8号法的保证的后果。对所得数据进行定性分析。根据研究结果发现,消费者经历的许多损失都与担保有关,例如对商店担保的欺诈,对银行担保的欺诈等等。因此,政府通过政府法规为保护消费者免受产品保修提供保障,其中之一就是UUPK。在执行过程中,消费者保护并没有得到最充分的落实,这一点得到了证明,因为政府仍然感受到许多违规行为和损失。而在联合王国,商业行为者如果犯下与货物有关的违法行为,将受到刑事行为的制裁/后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信