Evaluation of nine bioinformatic platforms using a viral model for RNA secondary structure prediction

Luisa Fernanda Restrepo Rodriguez, F. Cortés-Mancera
{"title":"Evaluation of nine bioinformatic platforms using a viral model for RNA secondary structure prediction","authors":"Luisa Fernanda Restrepo Rodriguez, F. Cortés-Mancera","doi":"10.1109/STSIVA.2013.6644925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RNA secondary (2D) structures are essential for cellular processes including protein translation; indeed some RNA viral pathogens use this strategy during replication cycle. Among Flaviviridae family, Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) presents a well experimentally-characterized secondary structure called IRES (Internal Ribosome Entry Site), which could be used as a Viral model for evaluating the accuracy RNA 2D structure in silico tools; the choice of free-available platforms is a principal concern because standard approaches for single-sequence RNA secondary structure prediction are dissimilar, training their parameters with known RNA structures that do not always include viral sequences. Here, we assessed the accuracy of nine web servers using the HCV IRES domain II. The platforms used were classified in three categories according to S and PPV values obtained. The lowest values were observed with IPKNOT 1.2.1 (NUPACK), Kinefold, VsFold 5.23 and CentroidHomfold, while IPKNOT 1.2.1 (CONTRAfold), IPKNOT 1.2.1 (McCaskill) and ContextFold 1.2.1 had acceptable computing output. Finally, MFOLD and RNAfold based on thermodynamic, RNAstructure (MaxExpect) and CentroidFold based on statistical weights, showed the highest accuracy with a similar topology to the expected structure, although these tools did not predict correctly all base-pairings. Further modifications in these platforms will be necessary to improve the RNA 2D structure prediction in viral models and others with higher RNA topology complexities.","PeriodicalId":359994,"journal":{"name":"Symposium of Signals, Images and Artificial Vision - 2013: STSIVA - 2013","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symposium of Signals, Images and Artificial Vision - 2013: STSIVA - 2013","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STSIVA.2013.6644925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RNA secondary (2D) structures are essential for cellular processes including protein translation; indeed some RNA viral pathogens use this strategy during replication cycle. Among Flaviviridae family, Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) presents a well experimentally-characterized secondary structure called IRES (Internal Ribosome Entry Site), which could be used as a Viral model for evaluating the accuracy RNA 2D structure in silico tools; the choice of free-available platforms is a principal concern because standard approaches for single-sequence RNA secondary structure prediction are dissimilar, training their parameters with known RNA structures that do not always include viral sequences. Here, we assessed the accuracy of nine web servers using the HCV IRES domain II. The platforms used were classified in three categories according to S and PPV values obtained. The lowest values were observed with IPKNOT 1.2.1 (NUPACK), Kinefold, VsFold 5.23 and CentroidHomfold, while IPKNOT 1.2.1 (CONTRAfold), IPKNOT 1.2.1 (McCaskill) and ContextFold 1.2.1 had acceptable computing output. Finally, MFOLD and RNAfold based on thermodynamic, RNAstructure (MaxExpect) and CentroidFold based on statistical weights, showed the highest accuracy with a similar topology to the expected structure, although these tools did not predict correctly all base-pairings. Further modifications in these platforms will be necessary to improve the RNA 2D structure prediction in viral models and others with higher RNA topology complexities.
利用病毒模型评价RNA二级结构预测的九个生物信息学平台
RNA二级(2D)结构对包括蛋白质翻译在内的细胞过程至关重要;事实上,一些RNA病毒病原体在复制周期中使用这种策略。在黄病毒科中,丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)具有一个被称为IRES (Internal Ribosome Entry Site,内部核糖体进入位点)的二级结构,该二级结构可以作为一种病毒模型,用于评估RNA二维结构的准确性;选择免费可用的平台是一个主要问题,因为单序列RNA二级结构预测的标准方法是不同的,用已知的RNA结构训练它们的参数,而这些结构并不总是包括病毒序列。在这里,我们使用HCV IRES域II评估了9个web服务器的准确性。根据获得的S和PPV值将使用的平台分为三类。IPKNOT 1.2.1 (NUPACK)、Kinefold、VsFold 5.23和CentroidHomfold的计算输出值最低,而IPKNOT 1.2.1 (CONTRAfold)、IPKNOT 1.2.1 (McCaskill)和ContextFold 1.2.1的计算输出值可以接受。最后,基于热力学的MFOLD和RNAfold、基于统计权重的RNAstructure (MaxExpect)和CentroidFold在拓扑结构与预期结构相似的情况下显示出最高的准确性,尽管这些工具不能正确预测所有碱基对。这些平台的进一步修改将有必要改善病毒模型和其他具有更高RNA拓扑复杂性的RNA 2D结构预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信