Exploring Price Accuracy on Uniswap V3 in Times of Distress

Lioba Heimbach, Eric Schertenleib, Roger Wattenhofer
{"title":"Exploring Price Accuracy on Uniswap V3 in Times of Distress","authors":"Lioba Heimbach, Eric Schertenleib, Roger Wattenhofer","doi":"10.1145/3560832.3563435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Financial markets have evolved over centuries, and exchanges have converged to rely on the order book mechanism for market making. Latency on the blockchain, however, has prevented decentralized exchanges (DEXes) from utilizing the order book mechanism and instead gave rise to the development of market designs that are better suited to a blockchain. Although the first widely popularized DEX, Uniswap V2, stood out through its astonishing simplicity, a recent design overhaul introduced with Uniswap V3 has introduced increasing levels of complexity aiming to increase capital efficiency. In this work, we empirically study the ability of Unsiwap V3 to handle unexpected price shocks. Our analysis finds that the prices on Uniswap V3 were inaccurate during the recent abrupt price drops of two stablecoins: UST and USDT. We identify the lack of agility required of Unsiwap V3 liquidity providers as the root cause of these worrying price inaccuracies. Additionally, we outline that there are too few incentives for liquidity providers to enter liquidity pools, given the elevated volatility in such market conditions.","PeriodicalId":366325,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM CCS Workshop on Decentralized Finance and Security","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM CCS Workshop on Decentralized Finance and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3560832.3563435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Financial markets have evolved over centuries, and exchanges have converged to rely on the order book mechanism for market making. Latency on the blockchain, however, has prevented decentralized exchanges (DEXes) from utilizing the order book mechanism and instead gave rise to the development of market designs that are better suited to a blockchain. Although the first widely popularized DEX, Uniswap V2, stood out through its astonishing simplicity, a recent design overhaul introduced with Uniswap V3 has introduced increasing levels of complexity aiming to increase capital efficiency. In this work, we empirically study the ability of Unsiwap V3 to handle unexpected price shocks. Our analysis finds that the prices on Uniswap V3 were inaccurate during the recent abrupt price drops of two stablecoins: UST and USDT. We identify the lack of agility required of Unsiwap V3 liquidity providers as the root cause of these worrying price inaccuracies. Additionally, we outline that there are too few incentives for liquidity providers to enter liquidity pools, given the elevated volatility in such market conditions.
在危难时刻探索Uniswap V3的价格准确性
金融市场已经发展了几个世纪,交易所已经趋同于依赖订单簿机制来做市。然而,区块链上的延迟阻止了去中心化交易所(dex)利用订单簿机制,反而引发了更适合区块链的市场设计的发展。虽然第一个广泛推广的DEX是Uniswap V2,它以其惊人的简单性脱颖而出,但最近推出的Uniswap V3的设计改革引入了越来越多的复杂性,旨在提高资本效率。在这项工作中,我们实证研究了Unsiwap V3处理意外价格冲击的能力。我们的分析发现,在最近两种稳定币(UST和USDT)价格突然下跌期间,Uniswap V3的价格是不准确的。我们认为Unsiwap V3流动性提供商缺乏敏捷性是导致这些令人担忧的价格不准确的根本原因。此外,我们概述了流动性提供者进入流动性池的动机太少,考虑到这种市场条件下的波动加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信