Unemployment and household spending in rural and urban India: Evidence from panel data 2019

Manavi Gupta, A. Kishore
{"title":"Unemployment and household spending in rural and urban India: Evidence from panel data 2019","authors":"Manavi Gupta, A. Kishore","doi":"10.2499/p15738coll2.134169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India has recorded high levels of unemployment and low labor force participation rates in recent years even before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown. How does an episode of unemployment or loss of income affect household consumption expenditure is an important question for designing effective safety nets. We use data on household-specific episodes of job loss and decline in income, from an earlier year (March-April 2019) to estimate the household response to employment shocks. We apply diff-in-diff and quantile regressions to a high-frequency panel data from a nationally representative survey of 1,75,000 households to estimate the impact of a job loss (and change in income) on household consumption expenditure-for urban and rural households, and households across different expenditure levels. We find that loss of employment of an earning member leads to a significant immediate decline in household consumption expenditure. The decline is much larger for urban households and households in the lowest and the highest deciles of monthly per capita consumption expenditure. Durable expenses go down the most. Expenditure on health and education also goes down significantly and there is evidence of adjustments in discretionary expenses too, especially for urban households. For households with only one earning member, borrowing does not increase after the job loss, suggesting credit constraints. Government cash transfers help rural households, as the beneficiaries show a smaller reduction in consumption expenditure after the shock. Our findings highlight the high vulnerability of urban households to economic shocks and can inform the design and targeting of income support and other safety-net programs in India and other developing countries.","PeriodicalId":131611,"journal":{"name":"IFPRI - Discussion Papers|2020. (1978):v + 37 pp. 33 ref.","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IFPRI - Discussion Papers|2020. (1978):v + 37 pp. 33 ref.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

India has recorded high levels of unemployment and low labor force participation rates in recent years even before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown. How does an episode of unemployment or loss of income affect household consumption expenditure is an important question for designing effective safety nets. We use data on household-specific episodes of job loss and decline in income, from an earlier year (March-April 2019) to estimate the household response to employment shocks. We apply diff-in-diff and quantile regressions to a high-frequency panel data from a nationally representative survey of 1,75,000 households to estimate the impact of a job loss (and change in income) on household consumption expenditure-for urban and rural households, and households across different expenditure levels. We find that loss of employment of an earning member leads to a significant immediate decline in household consumption expenditure. The decline is much larger for urban households and households in the lowest and the highest deciles of monthly per capita consumption expenditure. Durable expenses go down the most. Expenditure on health and education also goes down significantly and there is evidence of adjustments in discretionary expenses too, especially for urban households. For households with only one earning member, borrowing does not increase after the job loss, suggesting credit constraints. Government cash transfers help rural households, as the beneficiaries show a smaller reduction in consumption expenditure after the shock. Our findings highlight the high vulnerability of urban households to economic shocks and can inform the design and targeting of income support and other safety-net programs in India and other developing countries.
印度城乡失业和家庭支出:来自2019年面板数据的证据
近年来,甚至在COVID-19大流行和封锁爆发之前,印度就出现了高失业率和低劳动力参与率。失业或收入损失如何影响家庭消费支出,是设计有效安全网的一个重要问题。我们使用前一年(2019年3月至4月)的特定家庭失业和收入下降数据来估计家庭对就业冲击的反应。我们对来自全国代表性调查的175000户家庭的高频面板数据应用差中差和分位数回归,以估计失业(和收入变化)对家庭消费支出的影响-城市和农村家庭以及不同支出水平的家庭。我们发现,一个赚钱的成员失去工作,会导致家庭消费支出的显著下降。城市家庭以及月人均消费支出最低和最高的十分位数家庭的降幅要大得多。耐用品支出下降幅度最大。保健和教育支出也大幅下降,而且有证据表明,可自由支配的支出也有所调整,尤其是城市家庭。对于只有一个收入成员的家庭来说,失业后借贷不会增加,这表明信贷紧缩。政府的现金转移帮助了农村家庭,因为这些家庭的消费支出在经济危机后减少的幅度较小。我们的研究结果强调了城市家庭对经济冲击的高度脆弱性,可以为印度和其他发展中国家的收入支持和其他安全网项目的设计和目标提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信