Epilepsy in Dostoevsky’s The Idiot - Language, Stigma, and Mythology

A. Shukla
{"title":"Epilepsy in Dostoevsky’s The Idiot - Language, Stigma, and Mythology","authors":"A. Shukla","doi":"10.2218/FORUM.31.5496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Around 400 BC, Areatus -- one of Hippocrates’ pupils, proclaimed ‘epilepsy is an illness of various shapes and horrible’. Later, Areatus was also one of the people who called the disease ‘sacred’; according to them, a deity had sent a demon to possess the patient, or the patient had been cursed by the moon. The Hippocratic physicians were among the first to attempt to separate the scientific and the cultural/fictional discourses. However, even till the late nineteenth century, medical narratives were intertwined with the fictional narratives that surrounded epilepsy, and these narratives contributed significantly towards the stigma that has historically been associated with the disease. This paper will examine how medical and non-medical discourses shaped the representation of epilepsy and contributed to the cultural mythology surrounding epilepsy. In the course of this paper, the author will specifically focus on Dostoevsky’s The Idiot, in which the reader sees the author’s personal view of epilepsy, cleverly accommodated into the character of Prince Myshkin, who is surrounded by social stigmatisation. Dostoevsky suffered from epilepsy for a major part of his life, and he maintained detailed accounts of his seizures. His epilepsy had a huge influence on his writings and his perception of the world. Dostoevsky’s epilepsy has been seen as particularly relevant, since being an epileptic himself, his works provide the reader with an insight into the disease which is hard to find elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":439591,"journal":{"name":"FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & the Arts","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FORUM: University of Edinburgh Postgraduate Journal of Culture & the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/FORUM.31.5496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around 400 BC, Areatus -- one of Hippocrates’ pupils, proclaimed ‘epilepsy is an illness of various shapes and horrible’. Later, Areatus was also one of the people who called the disease ‘sacred’; according to them, a deity had sent a demon to possess the patient, or the patient had been cursed by the moon. The Hippocratic physicians were among the first to attempt to separate the scientific and the cultural/fictional discourses. However, even till the late nineteenth century, medical narratives were intertwined with the fictional narratives that surrounded epilepsy, and these narratives contributed significantly towards the stigma that has historically been associated with the disease. This paper will examine how medical and non-medical discourses shaped the representation of epilepsy and contributed to the cultural mythology surrounding epilepsy. In the course of this paper, the author will specifically focus on Dostoevsky’s The Idiot, in which the reader sees the author’s personal view of epilepsy, cleverly accommodated into the character of Prince Myshkin, who is surrounded by social stigmatisation. Dostoevsky suffered from epilepsy for a major part of his life, and he maintained detailed accounts of his seizures. His epilepsy had a huge influence on his writings and his perception of the world. Dostoevsky’s epilepsy has been seen as particularly relevant, since being an epileptic himself, his works provide the reader with an insight into the disease which is hard to find elsewhere.
陀思妥耶夫斯基《白痴》中的癫痫——语言、耻辱和神话
大约公元前400年,阿雷阿图斯——希波克拉底的学生之一,宣称“癫痫是一种形状各异的可怕疾病”。后来,阿雷阿图斯也是将这种疾病称为“神圣”的人之一;根据他们的说法,是神派了一个恶魔附在病人身上,或者是病人受到了月亮的诅咒。希波克拉底学派的医生是第一批试图将科学和文化/虚构话语分开的人。然而,直到19世纪晚期,医学叙事仍然与关于癫痫的虚构叙事交织在一起,这些叙事在很大程度上促成了历史上与该病相关的耻辱。本文将研究如何医学和非医学话语塑造癫痫的代表性和贡献周围的癫痫文化神话。在本文的过程中,作者将特别关注陀思妥耶夫斯基的《白痴》,在这本书中,读者可以看到作者对癫痫的个人看法,巧妙地融入了被社会污名所包围的梅什金王子的角色中。陀思妥耶夫斯基一生的大部分时间都在遭受癫痫的折磨,他对自己的癫痫发作进行了详细的记录。他的癫痫对他的写作和对世界的感知产生了巨大的影响。陀思妥耶夫斯基的癫痫被认为是特别相关的,因为他自己就是一名癫痫患者,他的作品为读者提供了在其他地方很难找到的对这种疾病的洞察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信