Developing into a group therapist: An empirical investigation of expert group therapists' training experiences.

Alexis Hahn, Jill D. Paquin, E. Glean, Kathleen McQuillan, D. Hamilton
{"title":"Developing into a group therapist: An empirical investigation of expert group therapists' training experiences.","authors":"Alexis Hahn, Jill D. Paquin, E. Glean, Kathleen McQuillan, D. Hamilton","doi":"10.1037/amp0000956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group therapy is a ubiquitous treatment modality. And its recent recognition as an APA specialty reflects both its empirical bases of support as a clinical intervention, as well as the decades of work that have gone into establishing competency standards for its practice. The present study seeks to add to this literature by examining how one develops into a group therapist, and how to best train group therapists to meet competencies. Specifically, for those who have achieved \"expertness\" in the practice of group work, this grounded theory (GT) study explores both how have they done so and how such practitioners, in turn, train and evaluate effectiveness in their group therapy trainees. Through analysis of in-depth interviews with nine peer-nominated expert group therapists, essential components of their development included an emphasis on experiential training, personal therapy, didactic coursework, participating in professional conferences, and simply enjoying group work. The study also identifies common competencies that these experts look for to determine effectiveness among their trainees, as well as how these experts determine their own level of effectiveness (and how these processes differ). Finally, the study proposes an emergent theoretical model as to how one develops a professional identity as a group therapist. Study limitations and implications for practice, training, advocacy, and research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":217617,"journal":{"name":"The American psychologist","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American psychologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Group therapy is a ubiquitous treatment modality. And its recent recognition as an APA specialty reflects both its empirical bases of support as a clinical intervention, as well as the decades of work that have gone into establishing competency standards for its practice. The present study seeks to add to this literature by examining how one develops into a group therapist, and how to best train group therapists to meet competencies. Specifically, for those who have achieved "expertness" in the practice of group work, this grounded theory (GT) study explores both how have they done so and how such practitioners, in turn, train and evaluate effectiveness in their group therapy trainees. Through analysis of in-depth interviews with nine peer-nominated expert group therapists, essential components of their development included an emphasis on experiential training, personal therapy, didactic coursework, participating in professional conferences, and simply enjoying group work. The study also identifies common competencies that these experts look for to determine effectiveness among their trainees, as well as how these experts determine their own level of effectiveness (and how these processes differ). Finally, the study proposes an emergent theoretical model as to how one develops a professional identity as a group therapist. Study limitations and implications for practice, training, advocacy, and research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
向团体治疗师发展:专家团体治疗师培训经验的实证调查。
团体治疗是一种普遍存在的治疗方式。它最近被认可为APA专业,这既反映了它作为临床干预支持的经验基础,也反映了几十年来为其实践建立能力标准的工作。本研究试图通过研究一个人如何发展成为一名团体治疗师,以及如何最好地训练团体治疗师来满足这些能力,来补充这些文献。具体来说,对于那些在小组工作实践中达到“专业”水平的人,这项扎根理论(GT)研究既探讨了他们是如何做到这一点的,也探讨了这些实践者如何反过来培训和评估他们的小组治疗学员的有效性。通过对九位同行提名的专家组治疗师的深度访谈分析,他们的发展的基本组成部分包括强调体验式培训、个人治疗、说教式课程、参加专业会议,以及简单地享受小组工作。该研究还确定了这些专家为确定受训者的有效性而寻找的共同能力,以及这些专家如何确定他们自己的有效性水平(以及这些过程有何不同)。最后,本研究提出了一个新兴的理论模型,关于一个人如何发展作为团体治疗师的职业认同。讨论了研究的局限性和对实践、培训、倡导和研究的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信