Prevalence of pathogenic bacteria in meat products and their antimicrobial resistance pattern

S. Madhup, R. Shrestha, Rakshya Panta, Laxmi Chauguthi, N. Katuwal, Sunaina Shrestha
{"title":"Prevalence of pathogenic bacteria in meat products and their antimicrobial resistance pattern","authors":"S. Madhup, R. Shrestha, Rakshya Panta, Laxmi Chauguthi, N. Katuwal, Sunaina Shrestha","doi":"10.3126/acclm.v4i1.42676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is increase in consumption of antimicrobial agents with misuse and/or overuse of antimicrobial agents in animals and resulting to rise in antimicrobial resistance. The controlled use of antimicrobials is important for national and international policymakers to draw guidelines on its use. Assessing AMR in meat-producing industry is essential to track emerging resistant pathogens that are common between animals and humans. In this study, we have aimed to investigate the prevalence of bacteria in meat products and the antimicrobial resistance pattern in those isolates.\nMethods: This study is a quantitative, observational study, where we collected meat samples (n=118) from shops, in Banepa and Dhulikhel Municipality. The samples were cultured in appropriate media for isolation of bacteria. Subsequently, AMR pattern was studied through antibiotic susceptibility test using Kirby Bauer Disc Diffusion method.\nResults: In our study, only two sites, out of 48, did not have any pathogenic bacteria. There were total of 113 iso-lates from 118 samples. E. coli (62.8%), Enterococcus (14.1%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.5%), were the most prevalent bacteria in processed samples including MRSA (4%). Additionally, 81.6% of the isolated E. coli were resistant to Ampicillin and 60.5% to Ciprofloxacin and 35% to Gentamycin. 43.6% of all isolated E. coli, 100% of all Klebsiella, 100% of all Enterobacter and 25% of all Citrobacter were multi-drug resistant. The resistance was mostly observed against Ampicillin (83.3%), followed by resistance against Ciprofloxacin (64.4%), Gentamycin (58.8%), Ceftazidime (38.8%), with the lowest resistance against Sulbactam/Cefoperazone (3.3%).\nConclusion: E. coli was the most prevalent organism in meat samples. Multi-drug resistance was also most common in E. coli with resistance against Ampicillin, Ciprofloxacin and Gentamycin. Therefore, we recommend for more controlled use of antibiotics in animal rearing industry and more hygienic environment at meat vendors.","PeriodicalId":185857,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/acclm.v4i1.42676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: There is increase in consumption of antimicrobial agents with misuse and/or overuse of antimicrobial agents in animals and resulting to rise in antimicrobial resistance. The controlled use of antimicrobials is important for national and international policymakers to draw guidelines on its use. Assessing AMR in meat-producing industry is essential to track emerging resistant pathogens that are common between animals and humans. In this study, we have aimed to investigate the prevalence of bacteria in meat products and the antimicrobial resistance pattern in those isolates. Methods: This study is a quantitative, observational study, where we collected meat samples (n=118) from shops, in Banepa and Dhulikhel Municipality. The samples were cultured in appropriate media for isolation of bacteria. Subsequently, AMR pattern was studied through antibiotic susceptibility test using Kirby Bauer Disc Diffusion method. Results: In our study, only two sites, out of 48, did not have any pathogenic bacteria. There were total of 113 iso-lates from 118 samples. E. coli (62.8%), Enterococcus (14.1%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (11.5%), were the most prevalent bacteria in processed samples including MRSA (4%). Additionally, 81.6% of the isolated E. coli were resistant to Ampicillin and 60.5% to Ciprofloxacin and 35% to Gentamycin. 43.6% of all isolated E. coli, 100% of all Klebsiella, 100% of all Enterobacter and 25% of all Citrobacter were multi-drug resistant. The resistance was mostly observed against Ampicillin (83.3%), followed by resistance against Ciprofloxacin (64.4%), Gentamycin (58.8%), Ceftazidime (38.8%), with the lowest resistance against Sulbactam/Cefoperazone (3.3%). Conclusion: E. coli was the most prevalent organism in meat samples. Multi-drug resistance was also most common in E. coli with resistance against Ampicillin, Ciprofloxacin and Gentamycin. Therefore, we recommend for more controlled use of antibiotics in animal rearing industry and more hygienic environment at meat vendors.
肉制品中致病菌的流行及其耐药性模式
背景:由于动物误用和/或过度使用抗菌药物,导致抗菌药物耐药性上升,抗菌药物的消费量有所增加。控制使用抗微生物药物对国家和国际决策者制定其使用准则非常重要。评估肉类生产行业的抗菌素耐药性对于追踪动物和人类之间常见的新出现的耐药病原体至关重要。在这项研究中,我们的目的是调查细菌在肉制品中的流行程度和这些分离株的抗微生物药物耐药性模式。方法:本研究是一项定量观察性研究,我们从巴内帕和杜利赫勒市的商店收集了肉类样本(n=118)。将样品在合适的培养基中培养以分离细菌。随后,采用Kirby Bauer圆盘扩散法进行抗生素药敏试验,研究AMR模式。结果:在我们的研究中,48个站点中只有两个站点没有任何致病菌。118份样品共鉴定出113种同位异构体。大肠杆菌(62.8%)、肠球菌(14.1%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(11.5%)是处理后样品中最常见的细菌,其中MRSA(4%)最为常见。对氨苄西林、环丙沙星和庆大霉素的耐药率分别为81.6%、60.5%和35%,对大肠杆菌、克雷伯菌、肠杆菌和柠檬酸杆菌的多重耐药率分别为43.6%、100%和25%。耐药率以氨苄西林最高(83.3%),其次为环丙沙星(64.4%)、庆大霉素(58.8%)、头孢他啶(38.8%),最低为舒巴坦/头孢哌酮(3.3%)。结论:大肠杆菌是肉类样品中最常见的微生物。多重耐药在对氨苄西林、环丙沙星和庆大霉素耐药的大肠杆菌中也最为常见。因此,我们建议在动物饲养行业中更严格地控制抗生素的使用,并在肉类供应商中建立更卫生的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信