Comparison of passivity based impedance controllers without torque-feedback for Variable Stiffness Actuators

M. Lendermann, B. R. P. Singh, Florian Stuhlenmiller, P. Beckerle, S. Rinderknecht, P. V. Manivannan
{"title":"Comparison of passivity based impedance controllers without torque-feedback for Variable Stiffness Actuators","authors":"M. Lendermann, B. R. P. Singh, Florian Stuhlenmiller, P. Beckerle, S. Rinderknecht, P. V. Manivannan","doi":"10.1109/AIM.2015.7222691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making robotic joints compliant in their interaction with the environment is an important objective. Controlling contact forces ensures safety as required for human-robot interaction. One issue is to achieve this along with position tracking for Variable Stiffness Actuators (VSA). Since VSAs are compliant themselves, they can contribute to safety requirements in terms of hardware. Beyond this, impedance controllers can additionally alter system output characteristics in software. In this paper, impedance control of VSAs without torquefeedback is investigated. Therefore, two algorithms, which are both based on the passivity principle but differ in the calculation of the desired actuator trajectory, are compared. Implementation without torque-feedback becomes possible by calculating the torque in the elastic element model-based. Simulation and experiments show good position tracking that is comparable for both algorithms. Experimental investigations of interaction with the environment show a compliant behavior which matches the desired compliance of the system for the first algorithm. Using second algorithm leads to a more complex closed loop system and therefore, the compliant behaviour could not be reproduced exactly.","PeriodicalId":199432,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM)","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2015.7222691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Making robotic joints compliant in their interaction with the environment is an important objective. Controlling contact forces ensures safety as required for human-robot interaction. One issue is to achieve this along with position tracking for Variable Stiffness Actuators (VSA). Since VSAs are compliant themselves, they can contribute to safety requirements in terms of hardware. Beyond this, impedance controllers can additionally alter system output characteristics in software. In this paper, impedance control of VSAs without torquefeedback is investigated. Therefore, two algorithms, which are both based on the passivity principle but differ in the calculation of the desired actuator trajectory, are compared. Implementation without torque-feedback becomes possible by calculating the torque in the elastic element model-based. Simulation and experiments show good position tracking that is comparable for both algorithms. Experimental investigations of interaction with the environment show a compliant behavior which matches the desired compliance of the system for the first algorithm. Using second algorithm leads to a more complex closed loop system and therefore, the compliant behaviour could not be reproduced exactly.
变刚度作动器无力矩反馈无源阻抗控制器的比较
使机器人关节在与环境的相互作用中具有柔顺性是一个重要的目标。控制接触力可确保人机交互所需的安全性。其中一个问题是要实现这一点,同时还要实现可变刚度致动器(VSA)的位置跟踪。由于vsa本身是兼容的,因此它们可以满足硬件方面的安全需求。除此之外,阻抗控制器还可以在软件中改变系统输出特性。本文研究了无转矩反馈的vsa的阻抗控制问题。因此,比较了两种基于无源原理但在执行器期望轨迹计算上存在差异的算法。通过基于弹性单元模型的转矩计算,实现无转矩反馈。仿真和实验表明,两种算法的位置跟踪效果相当。与环境相互作用的实验研究表明,系统的顺应行为符合第一种算法的期望顺应性。使用第二种算法会导致一个更复杂的闭环系统,因此,柔顺行为不能精确地再现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信