Towards a More Robust Sovereign Debt Restructuring Architecture: Innovations from Ecuador and Argentina

I. Clark, D. Lyratzakis
{"title":"Towards a More Robust Sovereign Debt Restructuring Architecture: Innovations from Ecuador and Argentina","authors":"I. Clark, D. Lyratzakis","doi":"10.1093/cmlj/kmaa032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Collective Action Clauses published by the International Capital Markets Association in 2014/2015 aim to facilitate orderly and consensual sovereign debt restructurings. The clauses were designed to give sovereigns flexibility in structuring and consummating a transaction that would be capable of attracting broad creditor support, while safeguarding the integrity of the process and the rights of creditor minorities. The recent restructurings of Argentina and Ecuador presented the first opportunities for the ICMA CACs to be tested in practice, but the “re-designation” and “PAC-man” strategies first seen in the Argentine restructuring revealed shortcomings in the ICMA contractual architecture. \n \nArgentina’s and Ecuador’s creditors responded by negotiating tailored refinements to the standard CACs that would mitigate the risk that a sovereign could compel a restructuring that is not supported by the requisite creditor supermajorities. The qualified restrictions on “re-designation” and “PAC-man” adopted by Ecuador and Argentina enhance the ICMA architecture and provide strong incentives for a sovereign to engage constructively with its private creditors in a consensus-building process that results in a restructuring proposal capable of achieving supermajority support.","PeriodicalId":269732,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Issues in Debtor-Creditor Relations (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Issues in Debtor-Creditor Relations (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmaa032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Collective Action Clauses published by the International Capital Markets Association in 2014/2015 aim to facilitate orderly and consensual sovereign debt restructurings. The clauses were designed to give sovereigns flexibility in structuring and consummating a transaction that would be capable of attracting broad creditor support, while safeguarding the integrity of the process and the rights of creditor minorities. The recent restructurings of Argentina and Ecuador presented the first opportunities for the ICMA CACs to be tested in practice, but the “re-designation” and “PAC-man” strategies first seen in the Argentine restructuring revealed shortcomings in the ICMA contractual architecture. Argentina’s and Ecuador’s creditors responded by negotiating tailored refinements to the standard CACs that would mitigate the risk that a sovereign could compel a restructuring that is not supported by the requisite creditor supermajorities. The qualified restrictions on “re-designation” and “PAC-man” adopted by Ecuador and Argentina enhance the ICMA architecture and provide strong incentives for a sovereign to engage constructively with its private creditors in a consensus-building process that results in a restructuring proposal capable of achieving supermajority support.
迈向更稳健的主权债务重组架构:来自厄瓜多尔和阿根廷的创新
国际资本市场协会于2014/2015年发布的集体行动条款旨在促进有序和协商一致的主权债务重组。这些条款旨在使主权国家在安排和完成交易方面具有灵活性,从而能够吸引广泛的债权人支持,同时维护程序的完整性和少数债权人的权利。阿根廷和厄瓜多尔最近的结构调整首次提供了在实践中检验国际货币基金组织共同管理机构的机会,但在阿根廷结构调整中首次出现的“重新指定”和“吃豆人”战略暴露了国际货币基金组织合同结构的缺陷。阿根廷和厄瓜多尔的债权人对此作出了回应,通过谈判对标准cac进行了量身定制的改进,这将降低主权国家可能强制进行重组的风险,而这种重组没有得到必要的绝大多数债权人的支持。厄瓜多尔和阿根廷对“重新指定”和“PAC-man”采取的有条件限制加强了ICMA架构,并为主权国家在建立共识的过程中与其私人债权人进行建设性接触提供了强有力的激励,从而产生能够获得绝大多数支持的重组提议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信