ANALISIS KUMPULAN PUISI “99 UNTUK TUHANKU” KARYA EMHA AINUN NADJIB: KAJIAN MIMETIK

Buana Bastra Pub Date : 2022-02-03 DOI:10.36456/bastra.vol6.no2.a5037

M. Chillah Syarifah Sakinah, Tri Indrayanti

{"title":"ANALISIS KUMPULAN PUISI “99 UNTUK TUHANKU” KARYA EMHA AINUN NADJIB: KAJIAN MIMETIK","authors":"M. Chillah Syarifah Sakinah, Tri Indrayanti","doi":"10.36456/bastra.vol6.no2.a5037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The view of this mimetic approach is the assumption that poetry is an imitation of nature or depiction of the world and human life in the universe. the target studied is the extent to which poetry represents the real world or the universe and the possibility of intellectuality with other works. the relationship between reality and imagery in literature is a dialectical relationship. mimetic is not possible without creation, but creation is not possible without mimetics. doses and links between the two can differ in culture, time, literature, personality of the author, etc. but one without the other is impossible and lastly the combination of creation and mimetics is not only valid and true for literary writers. Giving meaning to literature is an endless journey between two realities and an imaginary world. Literary works that are released and reality lose something essential, that is, the involvement of the reader in existence as a human being. Literary readers who lose the power of imagination exclude things that are no less essential for humans, namely alternatives to existence that exist with all their deficiencies or simpler thanks to art, literature, especially humans can live in a combination of reality and dreams that are both for us as humans. \n ","PeriodicalId":310090,"journal":{"name":"Buana Bastra","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buana Bastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36456/bastra.vol6.no2.a5037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

The view of this mimetic approach is the assumption that poetry is an imitation of nature or depiction of the world and human life in the universe. the target studied is the extent to which poetry represents the real world or the universe and the possibility of intellectuality with other works. the relationship between reality and imagery in literature is a dialectical relationship. mimetic is not possible without creation, but creation is not possible without mimetics. doses and links between the two can differ in culture, time, literature, personality of the author, etc. but one without the other is impossible and lastly the combination of creation and mimetics is not only valid and true for literary writers. Giving meaning to literature is an endless journey between two realities and an imaginary world. Literary works that are released and reality lose something essential, that is, the involvement of the reader in existence as a human being. Literary readers who lose the power of imagination exclude things that are no less essential for humans, namely alternatives to existence that exist with all their deficiencies or simpler thanks to art, literature, especially humans can live in a combination of reality and dreams that are both for us as humans.

查看原文本刊更多论文

这种模仿方法的观点是假设诗歌是对自然的模仿或对世界和宇宙中人类生活的描绘。研究的目标是诗歌在多大程度上代表了现实世界或宇宙，以及与其他作品的知性可能性。文学中现实与意象的关系是一种辩证关系。模仿不可能没有创造，但创造不可能没有模仿。两者之间的剂量和联系可以在文化，时间，文学，作者的个性等方面有所不同，但一个没有另一个是不可能的，最后，创作和模仿的结合不仅对文学作家是有效的和真实的。赋予文学意义是一个在两个现实世界和一个想象世界之间的无尽旅程。被释放和现实的文学作品失去了一些本质的东西，那就是读者作为一个人存在的参与。失去想象力的文学读者排除了对人类同样重要的事物，即存在于所有缺陷中存在的替代品，或者由于艺术，文学，特别是人类可以生活在现实和梦想的结合中，这两者都是我们作为人类。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Buana Bastra

自引率

0.00%

发文量