{"title":"Veblen, Economic Policy and the Present Crisis","authors":"P. Ramazzotti","doi":"10.3166/EJESS.26.73-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the paper is to discuss Veblen’s views of how and why business requirements intrinsically contrast the livelihood of the community. It contends that, unfortunately, Veblen’s notion of pecuniary gain is either too restrictive or too broad to conceive of an economy that overcomes the profitability-serviceability dichotomy. A proper understanding of the dichotomy and of possible policies to contrast it has to situate it within capitalist market relations, where important social categories are turned into commodities despite their incompatibility with such a role. This typically Polanyian approach aims to conceive of a policy that acts on the degree of commodification of the economy and, in particular, of its fictitious commodities, thereby avoiding waverings between the forced acquiescence to the status quo and the millenarian expectation of an all-encompassing change.","PeriodicalId":352454,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Economic and Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3166/EJESS.26.73-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to discuss Veblen’s views of how and why business requirements intrinsically contrast the livelihood of the community. It contends that, unfortunately, Veblen’s notion of pecuniary gain is either too restrictive or too broad to conceive of an economy that overcomes the profitability-serviceability dichotomy. A proper understanding of the dichotomy and of possible policies to contrast it has to situate it within capitalist market relations, where important social categories are turned into commodities despite their incompatibility with such a role. This typically Polanyian approach aims to conceive of a policy that acts on the degree of commodification of the economy and, in particular, of its fictitious commodities, thereby avoiding waverings between the forced acquiescence to the status quo and the millenarian expectation of an all-encompassing change.