Çoklu Veri Kaynağına Dayalı Performans Değerlendirme Sistemine İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi

Y. Sarıer
{"title":"Çoklu Veri Kaynağına Dayalı Performans Değerlendirme Sistemine İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi","authors":"Y. Sarıer","doi":"10.52848/ijls.943871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is explained in the Teacher’s Strategy Document (2017-2023) that to evaluate teachers a system which is based on multisource data will be used, and it is told that teachers’ personal and vocational development will be perpetuated with this system. This study aims to determine teachers’ ideas related to the evaluation system based on multi-source data. The data in this study were taken from 144 high school teachers who voluntarily participated in the study in June 2018. At the end of this study, teachers worry about the fact that the evaluators will not consider the ethical principles, especially while giving the evaluation grades, and they highly agree that enough pilot practice hasn’t been applied, students will be able to use the grades they will give as a threat and parents won’t know the teachers well enough to evaluate them. The considered evaluation system should be re-planned by taking into account the feelings and thoughts of all teachers, as in curriculum renewal studies. Especially rating scales should be prepared by considering academicians’ and teachers’ ideas. Evaluable, objective, and reliable criteria should be determined.","PeriodicalId":320285,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama","volume":"351 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Liderlik Çalışmaları Dergisi: Kuram ve Uygulama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52848/ijls.943871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is explained in the Teacher’s Strategy Document (2017-2023) that to evaluate teachers a system which is based on multisource data will be used, and it is told that teachers’ personal and vocational development will be perpetuated with this system. This study aims to determine teachers’ ideas related to the evaluation system based on multi-source data. The data in this study were taken from 144 high school teachers who voluntarily participated in the study in June 2018. At the end of this study, teachers worry about the fact that the evaluators will not consider the ethical principles, especially while giving the evaluation grades, and they highly agree that enough pilot practice hasn’t been applied, students will be able to use the grades they will give as a threat and parents won’t know the teachers well enough to evaluate them. The considered evaluation system should be re-planned by taking into account the feelings and thoughts of all teachers, as in curriculum renewal studies. Especially rating scales should be prepared by considering academicians’ and teachers’ ideas. Evaluable, objective, and reliable criteria should be determined.
在《教师战略文件(2017-2023)》中解释说,将使用基于多源数据的系统来评估教师,并告知教师的个人和职业发展将与该系统一起延续。本研究旨在基于多源数据确定教师对评价体系的看法。本研究的数据来自于2018年6月自愿参与研究的144名高中教师。在本研究结束时,教师们担心评议者会不考虑道德原则,特别是在给出评价分数时,他们高度同意没有足够的试点实践,学生可以将他们给出的分数作为威胁,家长对教师的了解不够,无法对他们进行评价。像课程更新研究一样,考虑到所有教师的感受和想法,重新规划经过考虑的评价制度。特别是在编制评定量表时,要考虑到院士和教师的意见。应确定可评估的、客观的和可靠的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信