The Post-Postmodern Turn: Challenging the Application of Kuhn's Model

Jesús Bolaño Quintero
{"title":"The Post-Postmodern Turn: Challenging the Application of Kuhn's Model","authors":"Jesús Bolaño Quintero","doi":"10.17561/grove.28.5588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The point of departure for this article is the much-debated death of postmodernism, heralded by influential experts on the subject such as Linda Hutcheon or Ihab Hassan at the beginning of the new millennium. Although the academic community as a whole has not agreed with this fact, there was an intense debate during the first years of the twenty-first century that was evidence of a change of attitude towards this cultural phase. With this in mind, the aim of this study is to provide a theoretical framework for the change in order to understand its nature. Analysing the theories developed by Thomas S. Kuhn on paradigm shifts in the field of science and applying them to the context of critical theory at the beginning of the millennium serves to challenge the very idea of postmodernism as a paradigm in the terms developed in Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. ","PeriodicalId":280802,"journal":{"name":"The Grove - Working Papers on English Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Grove - Working Papers on English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17561/grove.28.5588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The point of departure for this article is the much-debated death of postmodernism, heralded by influential experts on the subject such as Linda Hutcheon or Ihab Hassan at the beginning of the new millennium. Although the academic community as a whole has not agreed with this fact, there was an intense debate during the first years of the twenty-first century that was evidence of a change of attitude towards this cultural phase. With this in mind, the aim of this study is to provide a theoretical framework for the change in order to understand its nature. Analysing the theories developed by Thomas S. Kuhn on paradigm shifts in the field of science and applying them to the context of critical theory at the beginning of the millennium serves to challenge the very idea of postmodernism as a paradigm in the terms developed in Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 
后后现代转向:对库恩模型应用的挑战
本文的出发点是备受争议的后现代主义之死,在新千年之初,琳达·哈钦(Linda Hutcheon)或伊哈卜·哈桑(Ihab Hassan)等有影响力的专家曾预告过后现代主义之死。虽然学术界作为一个整体并不同意这一事实,但在21世纪的头几年里,有一场激烈的辩论,证明人们对这一文化阶段的态度发生了变化。考虑到这一点,本研究的目的是为这种变化提供一个理论框架,以了解其本质。分析托马斯·s·库恩关于科学领域范式转变的理论,并将其应用于千年之初的批判理论背景,有助于挑战库恩在《科学革命的结构》中提出的后现代主义作为范式的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信