The Normative Order of the Internet in National Legal Orders

M. Kettemann
{"title":"The Normative Order of the Internet in National Legal Orders","authors":"M. Kettemann","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198865995.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 7 takes a close look at the norms of the normative order of the internet and studies how they are integrated into national legal orders and especially how non-traditional norms, such as standards and soft law—a legal “tertium” next to national and international law—are legitimated through national legal processes. The chapter shows that national legal orders have recognized international law and national law. Monism and dualism have emerged to explain how the two dominions relate to each other: the choices range from subordination to coordination with varying primacies. Together with global constitutionalists, the study goes beyond this debate. It will argue that this tertium of normativity has been recognized by national orders: normative instruments that are neither “national” law nor “international” law, but part of the normative order of the internet. This enrichment of the legal vocabulary has been called a “change in the composition of the medium of law” by Jürgen Habermas.","PeriodicalId":284414,"journal":{"name":"The Normative Order of the Internet","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Normative Order of the Internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198865995.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 7 takes a close look at the norms of the normative order of the internet and studies how they are integrated into national legal orders and especially how non-traditional norms, such as standards and soft law—a legal “tertium” next to national and international law—are legitimated through national legal processes. The chapter shows that national legal orders have recognized international law and national law. Monism and dualism have emerged to explain how the two dominions relate to each other: the choices range from subordination to coordination with varying primacies. Together with global constitutionalists, the study goes beyond this debate. It will argue that this tertium of normativity has been recognized by national orders: normative instruments that are neither “national” law nor “international” law, but part of the normative order of the internet. This enrichment of the legal vocabulary has been called a “change in the composition of the medium of law” by Jürgen Habermas.
国家法律秩序中的互联网规范秩序
第7章仔细研究了互联网规范秩序的规范,并研究了它们是如何融入国家法律秩序的,特别是非传统规范,如标准和软法——仅次于国内法和国际法的法律“tertium”——是如何通过国家法律程序合法化的。这一章表明,国家法律秩序已经承认了国际法和国内法。一元论和二元论的出现是为了解释这两个领域是如何相互联系的:选择范围从从属到与不同的主体性协调。与全球的宪法主义者一起,这项研究超越了这种争论。本文将论证,这种规范性已经得到了国家秩序的认可:规范性文书既不是“国家”法,也不是“国际”法,而是互联网规范秩序的一部分。这种法律词汇的丰富被j根·哈贝马斯称为“法律媒介构成的变化”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信