Disclosure Services and Endogenous Segmentation in Takeover Markets

K. Kawakami
{"title":"Disclosure Services and Endogenous Segmentation in Takeover Markets","authors":"K. Kawakami","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3595002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a competitive model of takeovers among heterogeneous firms. Each firm owns a tradeable \"project\" and non-tradeable \"skill\". The complementarity between them generates takeovers. We construct an equilibrium with two segmented markets. In one market, firms pay a fee to an intermediary to fully disclose their project quality. In the other market, firms reveal at no cost that their project quality is above a minimum standard. The latter market matches projects to skill randomly. Yet, it significantly improves welfare by raising the elasticity of the demand for the full disclosure service. Regulations necessary to support this equilibrium are discussed.","PeriodicalId":232169,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3595002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a competitive model of takeovers among heterogeneous firms. Each firm owns a tradeable "project" and non-tradeable "skill". The complementarity between them generates takeovers. We construct an equilibrium with two segmented markets. In one market, firms pay a fee to an intermediary to fully disclose their project quality. In the other market, firms reveal at no cost that their project quality is above a minimum standard. The latter market matches projects to skill randomly. Yet, it significantly improves welfare by raising the elasticity of the demand for the full disclosure service. Regulations necessary to support this equilibrium are discussed.
收购市场中的信息披露服务与内生分割
我们提出了异质公司之间收购的竞争模型。每家公司都拥有可交易的“项目”和不可交易的“技能”。它们之间的互补性催生了收购。我们构造了一个有两个细分市场的均衡。在一个市场中,公司向中介支付费用,以充分披露其项目质量。在另一个市场上,公司免费透露他们的项目质量高于最低标准。后者的市场将项目与技能随机匹配。然而,它通过提高对全面披露服务的需求弹性,显著改善了福利。讨论了支持这种平衡所必需的规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信