Blending/Homogenizing Silos – All They’re Cracked up to Be?

G. Lynskey
{"title":"Blending/Homogenizing Silos – All They’re Cracked up to Be?","authors":"G. Lynskey","doi":"10.1109/CITCON.2019.8729102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consistency in raw material is vital for the production of cement with reliable characteristics. As the process of cement production has developed, so has the preparation and storage of the blend of materials used to produce clinker. This paper will discuss some of the history of how raw material has been produced, stored, and transported to the kiln. The effects of the changes on the storage of the material, more recently in storage silos, will be a major focus of the paper.From vertical kilns to horizontal, then the wet process to the dry process, to current day multi stage preheater towers, with silos of varying arrangements where material is aerated by twelfths, quarters, flat bottoms or inverted cones that use less power and air, the sophistication of the process has, in some cases, left the structural engineer responsible for the design of the storage of the raw material in the dark, sometimes with disastrous effects.Based on past experience and observations of dozens of existing homogenizing and blending silos, the structural engineering performed for the design of the silo storing the raw material prior to being taken to the preheater has been largely insufficient. Why? Has the structural engineer taking this responsibility not understood the principles of the process in the silo? Or is it a simple communication problem, where the process engineer has not communicated what is really happening inside the silo when the material is blended / homogenized. The answer is likely \"both\".It should be stated explicitly that the homogenizing / blending silos of recent years differ from most storage spaces. In most cases, material placed in a silo is in a static condition: material is placed inside, and stored until it is ready to be reclaimed. While that is a gross overstatement, compare this with the demands on a blending / homogenizing silo. These structures are not just expected to hold material, but they instead are now part of the process. Material is placed inside them and manipulated while in the storage space, with the desire to make them more homogenous.This blending / homogenizing process fluidizes or moves the material in segments. This causes the material in the silo to take on different properties in these different segments. Depending on the process being implemented (i.e. homogenization / blending, number of segments used, inverted cones, flat bottoms, eccentric or concentric discharge, etc.), the fluidized / activated material in the silo will be less stiff and exert less pressure outward than the remaining static material. This difference in stiffness and pressure results in bending in the silo walls, causing stresses that nearly always exceed those originally expected for uniform material pressure. This bending causes the overstress of the silo walls. This overstress first manifests itself in vertical cracking, then delaminated and spalled concrete, and in worst cases, catastrophic failure.Why are there so many homogenizing / blending silos with problems? Based on first hand observation, historical information, and discussions with those in the cement industry, the issue is one of miscommunication and misunderstanding of the principles. Personnel responsible for determining needed air pressures and geometry to homogenize the material did not properly communicate the process to the structural engineers responsible for designing the silos. Or, structural engineers did not fully understand material flow and differing material pressures when designing the silos. It should be noted that the concept of pressures of the same material changing based on its being at rest or active was not realized until the mid-1970s, with some inexperienced engineers still not being fully aware of its impact.This paper will discuss some of the different homogenizing / blending silo arrangements, with a discussion on historical trends, common issues, and options for repair.","PeriodicalId":135175,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE-IAS/PCA Cement Industry Conference (IAS/PCA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE-IAS/PCA Cement Industry Conference (IAS/PCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CITCON.2019.8729102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Consistency in raw material is vital for the production of cement with reliable characteristics. As the process of cement production has developed, so has the preparation and storage of the blend of materials used to produce clinker. This paper will discuss some of the history of how raw material has been produced, stored, and transported to the kiln. The effects of the changes on the storage of the material, more recently in storage silos, will be a major focus of the paper.From vertical kilns to horizontal, then the wet process to the dry process, to current day multi stage preheater towers, with silos of varying arrangements where material is aerated by twelfths, quarters, flat bottoms or inverted cones that use less power and air, the sophistication of the process has, in some cases, left the structural engineer responsible for the design of the storage of the raw material in the dark, sometimes with disastrous effects.Based on past experience and observations of dozens of existing homogenizing and blending silos, the structural engineering performed for the design of the silo storing the raw material prior to being taken to the preheater has been largely insufficient. Why? Has the structural engineer taking this responsibility not understood the principles of the process in the silo? Or is it a simple communication problem, where the process engineer has not communicated what is really happening inside the silo when the material is blended / homogenized. The answer is likely "both".It should be stated explicitly that the homogenizing / blending silos of recent years differ from most storage spaces. In most cases, material placed in a silo is in a static condition: material is placed inside, and stored until it is ready to be reclaimed. While that is a gross overstatement, compare this with the demands on a blending / homogenizing silo. These structures are not just expected to hold material, but they instead are now part of the process. Material is placed inside them and manipulated while in the storage space, with the desire to make them more homogenous.This blending / homogenizing process fluidizes or moves the material in segments. This causes the material in the silo to take on different properties in these different segments. Depending on the process being implemented (i.e. homogenization / blending, number of segments used, inverted cones, flat bottoms, eccentric or concentric discharge, etc.), the fluidized / activated material in the silo will be less stiff and exert less pressure outward than the remaining static material. This difference in stiffness and pressure results in bending in the silo walls, causing stresses that nearly always exceed those originally expected for uniform material pressure. This bending causes the overstress of the silo walls. This overstress first manifests itself in vertical cracking, then delaminated and spalled concrete, and in worst cases, catastrophic failure.Why are there so many homogenizing / blending silos with problems? Based on first hand observation, historical information, and discussions with those in the cement industry, the issue is one of miscommunication and misunderstanding of the principles. Personnel responsible for determining needed air pressures and geometry to homogenize the material did not properly communicate the process to the structural engineers responsible for designing the silos. Or, structural engineers did not fully understand material flow and differing material pressures when designing the silos. It should be noted that the concept of pressures of the same material changing based on its being at rest or active was not realized until the mid-1970s, with some inexperienced engineers still not being fully aware of its impact.This paper will discuss some of the different homogenizing / blending silo arrangements, with a discussion on historical trends, common issues, and options for repair.
混合/均质筒仓——它们都是什么?
原料的一致性对于生产具有可靠特性的水泥至关重要。随着水泥生产工艺的发展,用于生产熟料的混合料的制备和储存也有了发展。本文将讨论一些原材料是如何生产、储存和运送到窑炉的历史。变化对材料储存的影响,最近在储存筒仓中,将是本文的主要焦点。从垂直窑到水平窑,从湿法窑到干法窑,再到现在的多级预热塔,还有各种布置的筒仓,在筒仓中,物料按十二分之一、四分之一、平底或倒锥充气,使用更少的电力和空气,在某些情况下,工艺的复杂性使负责设计原材料储存的结构工程师在黑暗中工作,有时会带来灾难性的影响。根据过去的经验和对几十个现有的均质和混合料仓的观察,在原料进入预热器之前储存料仓的结构工程设计在很大程度上是不足的。为什么?承担这一责任的结构工程师是否不了解筒仓过程的原理?或者这是一个简单的沟通问题,当物料混合/均质化时,工艺工程师没有沟通筒仓内真正发生的事情。答案很可能是“两者都有”。应该明确指出,近年来的均质/混合筒仓不同于大多数存储空间。在大多数情况下,放置在筒仓中的材料处于静态状态:材料被放置在里面,并存储直到准备回收。虽然这是一种夸张的说法,但将其与混合/均质筒仓的需求进行比较。这些结构不仅可以容纳材料,而且它们现在是这个过程的一部分。材料被放置在里面,并在存储空间中进行操作,希望使它们更加均匀。这种混合/均质过程使物料流化或分段移动。这导致筒仓中的材料在这些不同的部分中具有不同的特性。根据正在实施的工艺(即均质/混合,使用的段数,倒锥,平底,偏心或同心排出等),筒仓中的流化/活化材料将比剩余的静态材料更不僵硬,向外施加的压力更小。这种刚度和压力的差异导致筒仓壁弯曲,造成的应力几乎总是超过原来预期的均匀材料压力。这种弯曲引起筒仓壁的过度应力。这种过度应力首先表现为垂直开裂,然后是混凝土分层和剥落,最坏的情况是灾难性的破坏。为什么有这么多的均质化/混合筒仓存在问题?根据第一手的观察,历史信息,以及与水泥行业人士的讨论,这个问题是对原则的误解和误解。负责确定物料均匀化所需的空气压力和几何形状的人员没有与负责设计筒仓的结构工程师进行适当的沟通。或者,结构工程师在设计筒仓时没有完全了解物料流动和不同的物料压力。应该指出的是,直到1970年代中期才认识到同一材料的压力根据其静止或活跃状态而变化的概念,一些没有经验的工程师仍然没有充分认识到它的影响。本文将讨论一些不同的均质/混合筒仓安排,并讨论历史趋势、常见问题和维修方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信