Decoloniality in danger or being boosted? An exploration of ECOWAS positions and conflict management in the Western African region

D. Stoica
{"title":"Decoloniality in danger or being boosted? An exploration of ECOWAS positions and conflict management in the Western African region","authors":"D. Stoica","doi":"10.15170/at.2022.16.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to explore the notion of decoloniality by examining the decisions and actions of the ECOWAS in response to the coup d’état in Burkina Faso in 2022, as well as other comparable sanctions imposed on Mali and Guinea during internal crisis challenges. These topics were raised and debated in various mass media outlets. For this purpose, readers are invited to imagine, based on ideas interpreted from official positions of the ECOWAS, or perceptions of them, expressed in academic narratives and the media, if decoloniality could be boosted or is in danger, following the decisions, actions, and positions of the ECOWAS. The interpretations through the lens of decoloniality portrayed in African narratives, and these explorations are characteristic of qualitative analysis. In examining how ECOWAS manages potential crises in the region, particularly in the cases of Guinea, Mali, and Burkina Faso, we can identify basic features of decoloniality. Taking a social-constructivist perspective, we can explore how African narratives of development can inspire critical resistance. Specifically, we must consider how power and relationships based on power can be decolonized to prioritize a people-centric view of development. In analyzing the use of violence and safety in the actions of the ECOWAS, we can determine whether they boost or endanger decoloniality. The academic community has shown considerable interest in the impact of the ECOWAS on the political climate of Western African states. However, it is important to consider the philosophical perspective on how the portrayal of ECOWAS actions and decisions can affect the narratives of opposition, anti-ism, and power dynamics. Specifically, in the case of internal conflicts, these portrayals can direct the debate on whether decolonization, as a theory, cultural movement, or process, can continue the work of African resistance initiated during the decolonization process which remains unfinished.","PeriodicalId":246647,"journal":{"name":"Afrika Tanulmányok / Hungarian Journal of African Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Afrika Tanulmányok / Hungarian Journal of African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/at.2022.16.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the notion of decoloniality by examining the decisions and actions of the ECOWAS in response to the coup d’état in Burkina Faso in 2022, as well as other comparable sanctions imposed on Mali and Guinea during internal crisis challenges. These topics were raised and debated in various mass media outlets. For this purpose, readers are invited to imagine, based on ideas interpreted from official positions of the ECOWAS, or perceptions of them, expressed in academic narratives and the media, if decoloniality could be boosted or is in danger, following the decisions, actions, and positions of the ECOWAS. The interpretations through the lens of decoloniality portrayed in African narratives, and these explorations are characteristic of qualitative analysis. In examining how ECOWAS manages potential crises in the region, particularly in the cases of Guinea, Mali, and Burkina Faso, we can identify basic features of decoloniality. Taking a social-constructivist perspective, we can explore how African narratives of development can inspire critical resistance. Specifically, we must consider how power and relationships based on power can be decolonized to prioritize a people-centric view of development. In analyzing the use of violence and safety in the actions of the ECOWAS, we can determine whether they boost or endanger decoloniality. The academic community has shown considerable interest in the impact of the ECOWAS on the political climate of Western African states. However, it is important to consider the philosophical perspective on how the portrayal of ECOWAS actions and decisions can affect the narratives of opposition, anti-ism, and power dynamics. Specifically, in the case of internal conflicts, these portrayals can direct the debate on whether decolonization, as a theory, cultural movement, or process, can continue the work of African resistance initiated during the decolonization process which remains unfinished.
去殖民主义处于危险之中还是正在被推动?探讨西非经共体在西非区域的立场和冲突管理
本文旨在通过考察西非经共体在应对2022年布基纳法索的政变时所采取的决定和行动,以及在内部危机挑战期间对马里和几内亚实施的其他类似制裁,来探讨非殖民化的概念。这些话题在各种大众媒体上被提出和辩论。有鉴于此,我们邀请读者根据西非经共体官方立场的解释,或学术叙述和媒体对他们的看法,想像在西非经共体的决定、行动和立场之后,非殖民化是否会得到促进或处于危险之中。在非洲叙事中,通过非殖民化的镜头进行解读,这些探索具有定性分析的特点。在研究西非经共体如何处理该地区的潜在危机,特别是几内亚、马里和布基纳法索的危机时,我们可以确定非殖民化的基本特征。从社会建构主义的角度来看,我们可以探讨非洲的发展叙事如何激发批判性的抵抗。具体地说,我们必须考虑如何使以权力为基础的权力和关系非殖民化,以便优先考虑以人民为中心的发展观。在分析西非经共体行动中使用暴力和安全时,我们可以确定它们是促进还是危害非殖民化。学术界对西非经共体对西非国家政治气候的影响表现出相当大的兴趣。然而,重要的是要考虑对西非经共体行动和决定的描绘如何影响反对派,反主义和权力动态的叙述的哲学观点。具体来说,在内部冲突的情况下,这些描述可以指导关于非殖民化作为一种理论、文化运动或过程是否可以继续在非殖民化过程中发起的非洲抵抗工作的辩论,而非殖民化过程仍未完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信