{"title":"P.K. Page's \"Inebriate\": A Gloss on a Glosa","authors":"R. Lecker","doi":"10.1353/esc.2019.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am interested in poems about poems. What should we call them? They are obviously a kind of ekphrasis: art that comments on art. But the term ekphrasis is more commonly associated with poems about visual images than it is with poems about poems. In his frequently cited study of ekphrasis, James A.W. Heffernan stresses its pictorial focus. He says that ekphrastic literature can be understood as “the verbal representation of graphic representation” (299). It “typically delivers from the pregnant moment of graphic art” what Heffernan calls “its embryonically narrative impulse.” Through this kind of narrative deliverance, ekphrastic works “make explicit the story that graphic art tells only by implication” (301). In her commentary on John Ashbery’s iconic and ekphrastic “Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror,” Helen Vendler expands the conception of art about art:","PeriodicalId":384095,"journal":{"name":"ESC: English Studies in Canada","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC: English Studies in Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/esc.2019.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
I am interested in poems about poems. What should we call them? They are obviously a kind of ekphrasis: art that comments on art. But the term ekphrasis is more commonly associated with poems about visual images than it is with poems about poems. In his frequently cited study of ekphrasis, James A.W. Heffernan stresses its pictorial focus. He says that ekphrastic literature can be understood as “the verbal representation of graphic representation” (299). It “typically delivers from the pregnant moment of graphic art” what Heffernan calls “its embryonically narrative impulse.” Through this kind of narrative deliverance, ekphrastic works “make explicit the story that graphic art tells only by implication” (301). In her commentary on John Ashbery’s iconic and ekphrastic “Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror,” Helen Vendler expands the conception of art about art:
我对关于诗的诗很感兴趣。我们该怎么称呼它们呢?它们显然是一种行话:评论艺术的艺术。但是ekphrasis这个词更常与关于视觉形象的诗歌联系在一起,而不是关于诗歌的诗歌。在他经常被引用的短语研究中,詹姆斯·a·w·赫弗南(James A.W. Heffernan)强调其图像焦点。他说,语言文学可以被理解为“图形表征的言语表征”(299)。它“典型地从图形艺术的孕育时刻”传递出赫弗南所说的“胚胎般的叙事冲动”。通过这种叙事的释放,绘画作品“将平面艺术只能通过暗示来讲述的故事表达出来”(301)。海伦·文德勒在评论约翰·阿什伯里(John Ashbery)的标志性作品《凸面镜中的自画像》(Self-Portrait In a Convex Mirror)时,扩展了关于艺术的艺术概念: