Analytic standard uncertainty evaluation of polynomial in normal/uniform random variables

Y. Kuang, M. Ooi, Arvind Rajan
{"title":"Analytic standard uncertainty evaluation of polynomial in normal/uniform random variables","authors":"Y. Kuang, M. Ooi, Arvind Rajan","doi":"10.1109/ICSIMA.2013.6717958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The standard uncertainty evaluation is very important in instrumentation and measurement industry because it is used to communicate, compare and combine uncertainty generated by various components in a system. The analytical evaluation of uncertainty has been recognized to be important and carries many advantages from theoretical perspective. Due to perceived complexity and feasibility of mathematical operation, the current practice of analytic uncertainty evaluation is confined to linear or linearized measurement equations, although the linearization is not always justifiable. A simple yet exact analytical method to evaluate standard uncertainty for polynomial nonlinearity was proposed by the authors, but the complexity of the method is high due to comprehensive and complete nature of the method. This paper presents a simplified procedure for normal and uniformly distributed random variables by taking advantage of the symmetry and simplicity of the functional forms. These two types of distributions are the most commonly used distributions in uncertainty analysis either through central limit theorem or maximal entropy principle. The effectiveness of the procedures is demonstrated using documented cases.","PeriodicalId":182424,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Conference on Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications (ICSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIMA.2013.6717958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The standard uncertainty evaluation is very important in instrumentation and measurement industry because it is used to communicate, compare and combine uncertainty generated by various components in a system. The analytical evaluation of uncertainty has been recognized to be important and carries many advantages from theoretical perspective. Due to perceived complexity and feasibility of mathematical operation, the current practice of analytic uncertainty evaluation is confined to linear or linearized measurement equations, although the linearization is not always justifiable. A simple yet exact analytical method to evaluate standard uncertainty for polynomial nonlinearity was proposed by the authors, but the complexity of the method is high due to comprehensive and complete nature of the method. This paper presents a simplified procedure for normal and uniformly distributed random variables by taking advantage of the symmetry and simplicity of the functional forms. These two types of distributions are the most commonly used distributions in uncertainty analysis either through central limit theorem or maximal entropy principle. The effectiveness of the procedures is demonstrated using documented cases.
正态/均匀随机变量多项式的解析标准不确定度评定
标准不确定度评定在仪器仪表和测量行业中非常重要,因为它用于交流、比较和组合系统中各部件产生的不确定度。不确定度的分析评价具有重要的理论意义和诸多优点。由于数学运算的复杂性和可行性,目前分析不确定性评估的实践仅限于线性或线性化的测量方程,尽管线性化并不总是合理的。提出了一种简单而精确的多项式非线性标准不确定度的分析方法,但由于该方法的全面性和全面性,其复杂性较高。本文利用函数形式的对称性和简洁性,给出了正态分布和均匀分布随机变量的简化方法。这两种分布是通过中心极限定理或最大熵原理在不确定性分析中最常用的分布。这些程序的有效性通过记录的案例来证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信