A Theoretical Formulism for Evidential Reasoning and Logic Based Bias Reduction in Geo-Intelligence Processing

Nicholas V. Scott
{"title":"A Theoretical Formulism for Evidential Reasoning and Logic Based Bias Reduction in Geo-Intelligence Processing","authors":"Nicholas V. Scott","doi":"10.11159/icsta22.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"- Geo-intelligence processing is strongly based on the need to bring together analytical viewpoints from multiple members comprising a geo-intelligence team so that unified answers to problems can be provided to leadership responsible for decision making. A three-tier evidential reasoning formulism is proposed and explained embodying a guide for the statistical/cognitive processing of geo-intelligence sensor information to facilitate this aim. The first tier comprises computational modeling used in conjunction with informal logic-based bias reduction by a multiple analyst team to interpret geo-intelligence information and create geo-intelligence reports. In the second tier, Bayesian belief networks over distinct provinces under geo-intelligence analytical investigation are created by each analyst through the amalgamation of statistical information provided by geo-intelligence reports. Bayesian belief network (BBN) results coupled with ancillary intelligence and analyst beliefs provide a set of propositions and probability masses summarizing the state of each province analyzed by each team member. The BBN state levels denote the three conditions of lack of nefarious substance presence, probable nefarious substance presence, and definite nefarious substance presence and are taken to be related, via a one-to-one mapping, directly to a new set of decision-based propositions – lack of adversary attack, probable adversary attack, and definite adversary attack. In the third tier, team member probability masses associated with these propositions, along with conjunctive and disjunctive combinations, are gradually amalgamated using Dezert-Smarandache (DS) evidential theory. A numerical example demonstrates the mechanics of the third-tier information fusion process which takes into account logical paradoxes and results in a single virtual analyst probability mass distribution associated with the geo-intelligence information amalgamation problem.","PeriodicalId":325859,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Statistics: Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/icsta22.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

- Geo-intelligence processing is strongly based on the need to bring together analytical viewpoints from multiple members comprising a geo-intelligence team so that unified answers to problems can be provided to leadership responsible for decision making. A three-tier evidential reasoning formulism is proposed and explained embodying a guide for the statistical/cognitive processing of geo-intelligence sensor information to facilitate this aim. The first tier comprises computational modeling used in conjunction with informal logic-based bias reduction by a multiple analyst team to interpret geo-intelligence information and create geo-intelligence reports. In the second tier, Bayesian belief networks over distinct provinces under geo-intelligence analytical investigation are created by each analyst through the amalgamation of statistical information provided by geo-intelligence reports. Bayesian belief network (BBN) results coupled with ancillary intelligence and analyst beliefs provide a set of propositions and probability masses summarizing the state of each province analyzed by each team member. The BBN state levels denote the three conditions of lack of nefarious substance presence, probable nefarious substance presence, and definite nefarious substance presence and are taken to be related, via a one-to-one mapping, directly to a new set of decision-based propositions – lack of adversary attack, probable adversary attack, and definite adversary attack. In the third tier, team member probability masses associated with these propositions, along with conjunctive and disjunctive combinations, are gradually amalgamated using Dezert-Smarandache (DS) evidential theory. A numerical example demonstrates the mechanics of the third-tier information fusion process which takes into account logical paradoxes and results in a single virtual analyst probability mass distribution associated with the geo-intelligence information amalgamation problem.
地球情报处理中证据推理和基于逻辑的偏见减少的理论公式
-地理情报处理强烈基于将地理情报团队中多个成员的分析观点汇集在一起的需要,以便向负责决策的领导提供统一的问题答案。提出并解释了一个三层证据推理公式,它体现了地理智能传感器信息的统计/认知处理指南,以促进这一目标。第一层包括计算建模,与非正式的基于逻辑的偏见减少相结合,由多个分析师团队解释地理情报信息并创建地理情报报告。在第二层,在地理情报分析调查下,每个分析师通过合并地理情报报告提供的统计信息来创建不同省份的贝叶斯信念网络。贝叶斯信念网络(BBN)的结果与辅助智能和分析师信念相结合,提供了一组命题和概率质量,总结了每个团队成员分析的每个省的状态。BBN状态级别表示缺乏有害物质存在、可能存在有害物质和确定存在有害物质的三个条件,并通过一对一的映射,直接与一组新的基于决策的命题相关——缺乏对手攻击、可能的对手攻击和确定的对手攻击。在第三层,使用Dezert-Smarandache (DS)证据理论,将与这些命题相关的团队成员概率质量以及合取和析取组合逐渐合并。一个数值例子说明了第三层信息融合过程的机制,该过程考虑了逻辑悖论,并导致与地理情报信息融合问题相关的单个虚拟分析师概率质量分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信