Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Follow-ups and Immunization: An Example from A District

O. Atac, A. Tokaç, Y. Tașçı, M. Sezerol
{"title":"Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Follow-ups and Immunization: An Example from A District","authors":"O. Atac, A. Tokaç, Y. Tașçı, M. Sezerol","doi":"10.33880/ejfm.2023120207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: We aim to compare the past trajectory of immunization services and different types of follow-ups with their current states during the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\nMethods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a district of Istanbul in February 2020, and included 138 Family Medicine Units. Services were compared monthly between 2019 and 2020, based on the antenatal, postpartum, infant, child follow-ups, and vaccine doses provided by the units. To examine the impact of the pandemic, the April-December periods of both years were also compared.\n\nResults: It was found that follow-ups and immunizations were continued without any decline despite an increase in delayed vaccines. When the monthly mean number of delayed vaccines were compared, the mean number of delayed vaccines was significantly higher in April-May-June 2020 than in the same months of the previous year. \n\nConclusion: Performance scores of different services do not differ according to the descriptive characteristics of physicians. Although physicians are successful in services such as follow-ups, delayed vaccines are prevalent among them as well. While services that can be carried out remotely seem to be continued, services that require face-to-face contact are interrupted. Interventions should be done to ensure the sustainability of indispensable services even during extraordinary times.\n\nKeywords: COVID-19, immunization, maternal-child health services, primary health care","PeriodicalId":436322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2023120207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: We aim to compare the past trajectory of immunization services and different types of follow-ups with their current states during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a district of Istanbul in February 2020, and included 138 Family Medicine Units. Services were compared monthly between 2019 and 2020, based on the antenatal, postpartum, infant, child follow-ups, and vaccine doses provided by the units. To examine the impact of the pandemic, the April-December periods of both years were also compared. Results: It was found that follow-ups and immunizations were continued without any decline despite an increase in delayed vaccines. When the monthly mean number of delayed vaccines were compared, the mean number of delayed vaccines was significantly higher in April-May-June 2020 than in the same months of the previous year. Conclusion: Performance scores of different services do not differ according to the descriptive characteristics of physicians. Although physicians are successful in services such as follow-ups, delayed vaccines are prevalent among them as well. While services that can be carried out remotely seem to be continued, services that require face-to-face contact are interrupted. Interventions should be done to ensure the sustainability of indispensable services even during extraordinary times. Keywords: COVID-19, immunization, maternal-child health services, primary health care
COVID-19大流行对随访和免疫的影响——以A区为例
目的:我们旨在比较COVID-19大流行期间免疫服务的过去轨迹和不同类型的随访情况。方法:本横断面研究于2020年2月在伊斯坦布尔的一个地区进行,包括138个家庭医学单位。根据这些单位提供的产前、产后、婴儿、儿童随访和疫苗剂量,在2019年至2020年期间每月对服务进行比较。为了检查大流行的影响,还比较了这两年的4月至12月期间。结果:尽管延迟接种疫苗的人数有所增加,但随访和免疫接种仍在继续,没有任何下降。当比较延迟疫苗的月平均数量时,2020年4月- 5月- 6月的延迟疫苗平均数量明显高于上年同期。结论:不同服务的绩效得分不存在医师描述特征的差异。虽然医生在随访等服务方面取得了成功,但延迟接种疫苗在他们中也很普遍。虽然可以远程执行的服务似乎还在继续,但需要面对面接触的服务却中断了。应采取干预措施,确保即使在非常时期也能持续提供必不可少的服务。关键词:COVID-19,免疫接种,妇幼卫生服务,初级卫生保健
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信