Can Digital Research be an Alternative Method during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia?

Bahtiar Rifai, Meilinda Sari Yayusman, Vera Bararah Barid
{"title":"Can Digital Research be an Alternative Method during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia?","authors":"Bahtiar Rifai, Meilinda Sari Yayusman, Vera Bararah Barid","doi":"10.14203/jissh.v11i1.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unprecedented COVID-19 global pandemic entails uncertain conditions, which lead people to seek alternative solutions to make activities running accordingly. Limited movements due to travel restriction and health protection confine people’s activities, including the research process. Postponing research activities is arguably not the best solution for scholars, mainly while conducting data collection. In social and humanities research, researchers mostly undertake data collection through field studies and face-to-face communications prior to the pandemic. Social distancing procedures, however, encourage people to avoid close contacts and cancel visit plans. Thus, researchers are necessary to find an alternative method during uncertainty situation. Digital research method (DRM) seems to be a plausible way to keep research ongoing, although the implementation of that method in the developing countries’ research activities, compared to the developed countries, remains lagging behind. This research aims to position DRM amidst the pandemic situation and show possibilities in using this method as an alternative in the developing countries by taking Indonesia as a case study. Results show that to make DRM works in Indonesia, some requirements need to be fulfilled to meet academic standards, and whether relevant or not the research topic applies to be processed utilizing digital method are also essential to be considered.","PeriodicalId":363096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14203/jissh.v11i1.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unprecedented COVID-19 global pandemic entails uncertain conditions, which lead people to seek alternative solutions to make activities running accordingly. Limited movements due to travel restriction and health protection confine people’s activities, including the research process. Postponing research activities is arguably not the best solution for scholars, mainly while conducting data collection. In social and humanities research, researchers mostly undertake data collection through field studies and face-to-face communications prior to the pandemic. Social distancing procedures, however, encourage people to avoid close contacts and cancel visit plans. Thus, researchers are necessary to find an alternative method during uncertainty situation. Digital research method (DRM) seems to be a plausible way to keep research ongoing, although the implementation of that method in the developing countries’ research activities, compared to the developed countries, remains lagging behind. This research aims to position DRM amidst the pandemic situation and show possibilities in using this method as an alternative in the developing countries by taking Indonesia as a case study. Results show that to make DRM works in Indonesia, some requirements need to be fulfilled to meet academic standards, and whether relevant or not the research topic applies to be processed utilizing digital method are also essential to be considered.
数字研究能否成为印度尼西亚2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的一种替代方法?
前所未有的COVID-19全球大流行带来了不确定的条件,导致人们寻求替代解决方案,使活动相应地进行。由于旅行限制和卫生保护限制了人们的活动,包括研究过程。推迟研究活动对学者来说可能不是最好的解决方案,主要是在进行数据收集的时候。在社会和人文研究方面,研究人员大多在大流行之前通过实地研究和面对面交流进行数据收集。然而,保持社会距离程序鼓励人们避免密切接触并取消访问计划。因此,研究人员有必要在不确定情况下寻找替代方法。数字研究方法(DRM)似乎是保持研究进行的一种可行的方法,尽管与发达国家相比,发展中国家在研究活动中实施这种方法的情况仍然落后。本研究旨在通过对印度尼西亚的案例研究,将DRM定位于大流行形势中,并展示在发展中国家使用这种方法作为替代方法的可能性。结果表明,要使DRM在印度尼西亚发挥作用,需要满足一些学术标准的要求,并且研究课题是否相关,是否适用使用数字方法进行处理也是必须考虑的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信