Transition to object orientation in software engineering education

G. Lowry, B. Morgan
{"title":"Transition to object orientation in software engineering education","authors":"G. Lowry, B. Morgan","doi":"10.1109/SEEP.1996.534045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transition to object orientation in software engineering education is discussed. The following areas are addressed: striking a correct balance between structured methods (SM) and object oriented methods (OOM) in our courses; deciding when we can cease teaching structured methods; identification of issues and problems that object CASE might pose for software engineering education; the role and number of student projects in the curriculum; industry expectations of new graduates; what linkage, if any, should exist in our courses between object technology and client/server applications and architectures; how to focus on core knowledge rather than on the current technology; the role of OMG; and what benefits our graduates can help their future employers realise from transition to object technology.","PeriodicalId":416862,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1996 International Conference Software Engineering: Education and Practice","volume":"06 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1996 International Conference Software Engineering: Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEEP.1996.534045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The transition to object orientation in software engineering education is discussed. The following areas are addressed: striking a correct balance between structured methods (SM) and object oriented methods (OOM) in our courses; deciding when we can cease teaching structured methods; identification of issues and problems that object CASE might pose for software engineering education; the role and number of student projects in the curriculum; industry expectations of new graduates; what linkage, if any, should exist in our courses between object technology and client/server applications and architectures; how to focus on core knowledge rather than on the current technology; the role of OMG; and what benefits our graduates can help their future employers realise from transition to object technology.
软件工程教育向面向对象的过渡
讨论了软件工程教育向面向对象的转变。解决以下方面:在我们的课程中,在结构化方法(SM)和面向对象方法(OOM)之间取得正确的平衡;决定什么时候我们可以停止教授结构化方法;识别对象CASE可能给软件工程教育带来的问题;学生专题在课程中的角色和数量;行业对应届毕业生的期望;在我们的课程中,对象技术与客户/服务器应用程序和体系结构之间应该存在什么联系(如果有的话)?如何关注核心知识而不是当前的技术;OMG的角色;我们的毕业生可以帮助他们未来的雇主实现从过渡到对象技术的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信