{"title":"The Objectives and Principles of the TRIPs Agreement","authors":"Peter K. Yu","doi":"10.4337/9781849806596.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, which established the minimum standards for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights for WTO members, remains one of the more controversial international intellectual property agreements that have entered into force. Although that Agreement embraces a highly problematic super-size-fits-all approach, it includes a number of safeguards and flexibilities to facilitate economic development and to protect the public interest. Articles 7 and 8, in particular, lay out explicit and important objectives and principles that can play important roles in the interpretation and implementation of the Agreement. Presented at the 2009 Santa Fe Conference, this article begins by tracing the origins and development of Articles 7 and 8 of the TRIPs Agreement. It then examines the normative content of these provisions while highlighting the interpretations made by WTO panels and the Appellate Body as well as the implications of the two Doha declarations. The article concludes by exploring five different ways in which Articles 7 and 8 can be used to facilitate a more flexible interpretation and implementation of the TRIPs Agreement: (1) as a guiding light for interpretation and implementation; (2) as a shield against aggressive demands for increased intellectual property protection; (3) as a sword to challenge provisions that overprotect intellectual property rights or tolerate their abuse; (4) as a bridge to connect the TRIPS regime with other intellectual property or related international regimes; and (5) as a seed for the development of future international intellectual property norms.","PeriodicalId":281709,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual Property Law eJournal","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"86","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual Property Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806596.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 86
Abstract
The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, which established the minimum standards for the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights for WTO members, remains one of the more controversial international intellectual property agreements that have entered into force. Although that Agreement embraces a highly problematic super-size-fits-all approach, it includes a number of safeguards and flexibilities to facilitate economic development and to protect the public interest. Articles 7 and 8, in particular, lay out explicit and important objectives and principles that can play important roles in the interpretation and implementation of the Agreement. Presented at the 2009 Santa Fe Conference, this article begins by tracing the origins and development of Articles 7 and 8 of the TRIPs Agreement. It then examines the normative content of these provisions while highlighting the interpretations made by WTO panels and the Appellate Body as well as the implications of the two Doha declarations. The article concludes by exploring five different ways in which Articles 7 and 8 can be used to facilitate a more flexible interpretation and implementation of the TRIPs Agreement: (1) as a guiding light for interpretation and implementation; (2) as a shield against aggressive demands for increased intellectual property protection; (3) as a sword to challenge provisions that overprotect intellectual property rights or tolerate their abuse; (4) as a bridge to connect the TRIPS regime with other intellectual property or related international regimes; and (5) as a seed for the development of future international intellectual property norms.
《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights)确立了世贸组织成员国保护和执行知识产权的最低标准,至今仍是已生效的争议较大的国际知识产权协定之一。虽然该协定采用了一种非常成问题的“放之四海而皆通”的办法,但它包括了一些保障措施和灵活性,以促进经济发展和保护公众利益。特别是第7条和第8条规定了可以在解释和执行《协定》方面发挥重要作用的明确和重要的目标和原则。本文在2009年圣达菲会议上发表,首先追溯了《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》第7条和第8条的起源和发展。然后审查这些规定的规范性内容,同时强调世贸组织专家组和上诉机构所作的解释以及两个多哈宣言的影响。文章最后探讨了可以利用第7条和第8条促进更灵活地解释和实施《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》的五种不同方式:(1)作为解释和实施的指路明灯;(2)作为抵御激进的知识产权保护要求的屏障;(3)作为挑战过度保护知识产权或容忍滥用知识产权规定的利剑;(4)作为连接TRIPS制度与其他知识产权或相关国际制度的桥梁;(5)作为未来国际知识产权规范发展的种子。