Theology of N. Berdyaev’s Culture

Ludmila G. Zimovets, L. Kaplina, A. Banartseva
{"title":"Theology of N. Berdyaev’s Culture","authors":"Ludmila G. Zimovets, L. Kaplina, A. Banartseva","doi":"10.2991/ESSD-19.2019.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"the paper considers the specificity of the cultural concept of N. Berdyaev. In this work we analyze philosophical and methodological prerequisites of his culture concept and reveal the duality and antinomy of the cultural creativity phenomenon within the framework of Berdyaev’s “crisis” concept. The reconstructed dynamics of Berdyaev’s religious search and a comparative analysis of cultural concepts by Berdyaev and Spengler reveal the specificity of Berdyaev’s cultural-cultural concept and show that his philosophy was based on philosophical theologism and philosophical religiosity. The main features of the philosophy of life, the life of the Spirit entirely determine the originality of the concept of culture by Berdyaev. In our paper we justify that mysticism and creativity according to Berdyaev is a spiritual substitute for religion. It is argued that Berdyaev’s desire to create a philosophical analogue of religion is nothing more than an attempt to create a cultural analogue of theology, that is, theology of culture. The work provides a brief overview of the most characteristic themes of different versions of cultural theology and it is alleged that in one context or another, the understanding and disclosure of these themes is in the culturally sensitive concept of Berdyaev. This allows us to qualify Berdyaev’s concept of culture as a theology of culture, in contrast to the morphology of culture","PeriodicalId":339935,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Social Development (ESSD 2019)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Social Development (ESSD 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ESSD-19.2019.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

the paper considers the specificity of the cultural concept of N. Berdyaev. In this work we analyze philosophical and methodological prerequisites of his culture concept and reveal the duality and antinomy of the cultural creativity phenomenon within the framework of Berdyaev’s “crisis” concept. The reconstructed dynamics of Berdyaev’s religious search and a comparative analysis of cultural concepts by Berdyaev and Spengler reveal the specificity of Berdyaev’s cultural-cultural concept and show that his philosophy was based on philosophical theologism and philosophical religiosity. The main features of the philosophy of life, the life of the Spirit entirely determine the originality of the concept of culture by Berdyaev. In our paper we justify that mysticism and creativity according to Berdyaev is a spiritual substitute for religion. It is argued that Berdyaev’s desire to create a philosophical analogue of religion is nothing more than an attempt to create a cultural analogue of theology, that is, theology of culture. The work provides a brief overview of the most characteristic themes of different versions of cultural theology and it is alleged that in one context or another, the understanding and disclosure of these themes is in the culturally sensitive concept of Berdyaev. This allows us to qualify Berdyaev’s concept of culture as a theology of culture, in contrast to the morphology of culture
别尔嘉耶夫文化神学
本文考虑了别尔佳耶夫文化概念的特殊性。本文分析了别尔佳耶夫文化观念形成的哲学和方法论前提,揭示了别尔佳耶夫“危机”观念框架下文化创造现象的二元性和矛盾性。通过对别尔嘉耶夫宗教探索动态的重构以及对别尔嘉耶夫与斯宾格勒文化概念的比较分析,可以看出别尔嘉耶夫的文化-文化概念的特殊性,表明别尔嘉耶夫的哲学建立在哲学神学和哲学宗教性的基础之上。生命哲学、精神生命的主要特征完全决定了别尔佳耶夫文化概念的独创性。在我们的论文中,我们证明,根据别尔佳耶夫的神秘主义和创造力是宗教的精神替代品。有人认为,别尔嘉耶夫希望创造一种宗教的哲学类比,不过是试图创造一种神学的文化类比,即文化的神学。该作品简要概述了不同版本的文化神学最具特色的主题,据称,在这样或那样的背景下,对这些主题的理解和披露是在别尔佳耶夫的文化敏感概念中。这使我们可以将别尔嘉耶夫的文化概念限定为文化神学,而不是文化形态学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信