Modern Democratic Theories and Political Education in Japan

Yusuke Arai
{"title":"Modern Democratic Theories and Political Education in Japan","authors":"Yusuke Arai","doi":"10.7571/ESJKYOIKU.13.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the “subjectifi cation” function of political education in democracy, considering the present situation of political education in Japan. In particular, from the point of view of political science, it focuses on the relationship between democratic theories and political education and considers whether the possibility of the self-transformation of human beings is included in such theories. In Japan, the political education provided at school is aimed at conferring information and knowledge of the existing political system as a sovereign citizen, and at fostering attitudes toward and motivation for participating in politics. Political education in Japanese high schools tends to be biased towards the functions of “qualifi cation” and “socialization” in order to maintain political neutrality, as stipulated by the Basic Education Act of Japan. More fundamentally, what kind of political system people understand democracy and how people understand a citizen in the political system seem to contribute to the tendency as well. In order to consider the future direction of political education in Japan, we need discussion from a wider perspective through the theoretical reexamination of democracy. In the aggregative democracy model, a citizen’s preferences are treated as given. It is not concerned with how the citizen’s preferences were formed or how their values and preferences were changed as a result of interactions with others through participation in the political process. The deliberative democracy model, in contrast, takes the view that human beings can be transformed, and therefore there is an opportunity for political education. However, it has been pointed out that the deliberative democracy model restricts citizens from participating in deliberation because the model requires rational deliberation. Iris Young calls this internal exclusion and suggests communicative democracy as a democratic model to overcome it. Young’s communicative democracy advocates the importance of political education that opens up the possibility of self-transformation through interactions with others with diff erent views. Modern Democratic Theories and Political Education in Japan","PeriodicalId":205276,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Japan","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7571/ESJKYOIKU.13.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper examines the “subjectifi cation” function of political education in democracy, considering the present situation of political education in Japan. In particular, from the point of view of political science, it focuses on the relationship between democratic theories and political education and considers whether the possibility of the self-transformation of human beings is included in such theories. In Japan, the political education provided at school is aimed at conferring information and knowledge of the existing political system as a sovereign citizen, and at fostering attitudes toward and motivation for participating in politics. Political education in Japanese high schools tends to be biased towards the functions of “qualifi cation” and “socialization” in order to maintain political neutrality, as stipulated by the Basic Education Act of Japan. More fundamentally, what kind of political system people understand democracy and how people understand a citizen in the political system seem to contribute to the tendency as well. In order to consider the future direction of political education in Japan, we need discussion from a wider perspective through the theoretical reexamination of democracy. In the aggregative democracy model, a citizen’s preferences are treated as given. It is not concerned with how the citizen’s preferences were formed or how their values and preferences were changed as a result of interactions with others through participation in the political process. The deliberative democracy model, in contrast, takes the view that human beings can be transformed, and therefore there is an opportunity for political education. However, it has been pointed out that the deliberative democracy model restricts citizens from participating in deliberation because the model requires rational deliberation. Iris Young calls this internal exclusion and suggests communicative democracy as a democratic model to overcome it. Young’s communicative democracy advocates the importance of political education that opens up the possibility of self-transformation through interactions with others with diff erent views. Modern Democratic Theories and Political Education in Japan
日本近代民主理论与政治教育
本文结合日本政治教育的现状,考察了政治教育在民主政治中的“主体化”功能。特别是从政治学的角度,关注民主理论与政治教育的关系,思考民主理论中是否包含了人的自我转化的可能性。在日本,学校提供的政治教育旨在传授作为主权公民对现有政治制度的信息和知识,并培养对政治的态度和参与政治的动机。日本《基础教育法》规定,为了保持政治中立,日本高中政治教育倾向于“资格化”和“社会化”功能。更根本的是,人们对民主的理解是什么样的政治制度,人们如何理解政治制度中的公民,似乎也有助于这种趋势。为了思考日本政治教育的未来走向,我们需要通过对民主主义的理论重新审视,从更广阔的视角进行探讨。在综合民主模型中,公民的偏好被视为给定的。它不关心公民的偏好是如何形成的,也不关心他们的价值观和偏好是如何通过参与政治进程与他人互动而改变的。相比之下,协商民主模式认为人是可以改造的,因此存在政治教育的机会。但也有人指出,协商民主模式要求理性协商,限制了公民参与协商。Iris Young称之为内部排斥,并建议将交流民主作为克服这种排斥的民主模式。杨的交往民主主张政治教育的重要性,通过与持不同观点的人互动,开启自我转化的可能性。日本近代民主理论与政治教育
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信