Using a Consultation Assignment to Enhance Trainees’ Understanding and Implementation of Consultation and Social Justice in Career Counseling

Stephanie Winkeljohn Black, Zainab Akef, Centia Thomas
{"title":"Using a Consultation Assignment to Enhance Trainees’ Understanding and Implementation of Consultation and Social Justice in Career Counseling","authors":"Stephanie Winkeljohn Black, Zainab Akef, Centia Thomas","doi":"10.33043/jsacp.14.1.106-123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social justice advocacy and career counseling are foundational competencies for counseling professionals. However, training in advocacy and consultation outside of the classroom (i.e., in the community) is infrequent and career counseling courses, despite conceptualizing systemic issues, often focus on individual-level interventions. There is an opportunity to merge these competencies into a single experience for graduate trainees. Graduate students in a clinical psychology master’s program completed a pilot, semester-long assignment in their career counseling class, which required them to work as consultants to organizations on a social justice oriented, career counseling focused project. We used a multi-method qualitative approach to analyze students’ career theory knowledge and application and social justice advocacy. Data were generated through students’ written assignments. Using coding reliability thematic analysis, data indicated most students were able to describe consultant and individual difficulties from an advocate and social justice framework, but about half the students struggled to integrate these social justice frames into career counseling theories and interventions. Five themes relating to student development emerged (e.g., recognizing privilege, self-efficacy), alongside three themes related to the logistics of the assignment design and implementation. Results are discussed alongside how to improve the assignment.","PeriodicalId":196461,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33043/jsacp.14.1.106-123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social justice advocacy and career counseling are foundational competencies for counseling professionals. However, training in advocacy and consultation outside of the classroom (i.e., in the community) is infrequent and career counseling courses, despite conceptualizing systemic issues, often focus on individual-level interventions. There is an opportunity to merge these competencies into a single experience for graduate trainees. Graduate students in a clinical psychology master’s program completed a pilot, semester-long assignment in their career counseling class, which required them to work as consultants to organizations on a social justice oriented, career counseling focused project. We used a multi-method qualitative approach to analyze students’ career theory knowledge and application and social justice advocacy. Data were generated through students’ written assignments. Using coding reliability thematic analysis, data indicated most students were able to describe consultant and individual difficulties from an advocate and social justice framework, but about half the students struggled to integrate these social justice frames into career counseling theories and interventions. Five themes relating to student development emerged (e.g., recognizing privilege, self-efficacy), alongside three themes related to the logistics of the assignment design and implementation. Results are discussed alongside how to improve the assignment.
运用咨询作业提高学员对职业咨询中咨询与社会公正的理解与实施
社会正义倡导和职业咨询是咨询专业人员的基本能力。然而,在课堂之外(即在社区)进行宣传和咨询方面的培训很少,职业咨询课程尽管概念化了系统性问题,但往往侧重于个人一级的干预。对于研究生学员来说,有机会将这些能力融合到一个单一的经历中。临床心理学硕士课程的研究生在他们的职业咨询课上完成了一个试验性的、长达一个学期的作业,要求他们在一个以社会正义为导向的、以职业咨询为重点的项目中担任组织的顾问。本研究采用多方法定性分析学生的职业理论知识与应用及社会正义倡导情况。数据是通过学生的书面作业生成的。使用编码可靠性主题分析,数据表明大多数学生能够从倡导者和社会正义框架描述咨询师和个人的困难,但大约一半的学生努力将这些社会正义框架整合到职业咨询理论和干预措施中。与学生发展相关的五个主题出现了(例如,承认特权,自我效能),以及与作业设计和实施的后勤相关的三个主题。结果与如何改进作业一起讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信