Does Authenticity of Influencers Matter? Examining the Impact on Purchase Decisions

A. Choi, Jui Ramaprasad, Hyunji So
{"title":"Does Authenticity of Influencers Matter? Examining the Impact on Purchase Decisions","authors":"A. Choi, Jui Ramaprasad, Hyunji So","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3858887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media has brought to light the role of authenticity in influencing decision-making, but little work has examined specific authenticity cues that might impact purchase. In other words, does authenticity influence consumer actions? In this paper, we examine an e-commerce platform that leverages influencers to sell beauty products, and examine how two authenticity cues – explicit transparency (#ad) and implicit authenticity (photo originality) – impact purchase decisions. We draw from expectation-confirmation theory and suggest that the impact that perceived authenticity has on purchase decisions and post-purchase satisfaction depends on the type of authenticity cue and is shaped by the expectation of the consumer. We further argue that expectations vary depending on the consumer experience with an influencer and therefore explore the moderation effect of customer loyalty. Our findings suggest that consumers have different reactions depending on the authenticity cues – their purchase probability decreases with transparency but increases with photo originality. We see that with greater loyalty, consumers are more negatively impacted by the #ad tag and are less positively influenced by the originality of the photo. On the other hand, purchase depth—loyalty to one influencer—mitigates the negative effect of the #ad tag and heightens the positive impact of photo originality. We suggest that experience with the influencer provides evidence that the higher the expectation for authenticity (depth) the higher the negative impact of in-authenticity. We also discuss limitations and implications of our work.","PeriodicalId":202820,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Communication eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizational Communication eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3858887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social media has brought to light the role of authenticity in influencing decision-making, but little work has examined specific authenticity cues that might impact purchase. In other words, does authenticity influence consumer actions? In this paper, we examine an e-commerce platform that leverages influencers to sell beauty products, and examine how two authenticity cues – explicit transparency (#ad) and implicit authenticity (photo originality) – impact purchase decisions. We draw from expectation-confirmation theory and suggest that the impact that perceived authenticity has on purchase decisions and post-purchase satisfaction depends on the type of authenticity cue and is shaped by the expectation of the consumer. We further argue that expectations vary depending on the consumer experience with an influencer and therefore explore the moderation effect of customer loyalty. Our findings suggest that consumers have different reactions depending on the authenticity cues – their purchase probability decreases with transparency but increases with photo originality. We see that with greater loyalty, consumers are more negatively impacted by the #ad tag and are less positively influenced by the originality of the photo. On the other hand, purchase depth—loyalty to one influencer—mitigates the negative effect of the #ad tag and heightens the positive impact of photo originality. We suggest that experience with the influencer provides evidence that the higher the expectation for authenticity (depth) the higher the negative impact of in-authenticity. We also discuss limitations and implications of our work.
影响者的真实性重要吗?检查对购买决策的影响
社交媒体揭示了真实性在影响决策方面的作用,但很少有人研究可能影响购买的具体真实性线索。换句话说,真实性是否会影响消费者的行为?在本文中,我们研究了一个利用网红销售美容产品的电子商务平台,并研究了两个真实性线索——明确的透明度(#ad)和隐含的真实性(照片原创性)——如何影响购买决策。根据期望-确认理论,我们认为感知真实性对购买决策和购后满意度的影响取决于真实性线索的类型,并受到消费者期望的影响。我们进一步认为,期望取决于消费者与网红的体验,因此探讨了客户忠诚度的调节作用。我们的研究结果表明,消费者对真实性线索的反应不同——他们的购买可能性随着照片的透明度而降低,而随着照片的原创性而增加。我们发现,忠诚度越高,消费者受到#ad标签的负面影响越大,而受到照片原创性的正面影响越小。另一方面,购买深度——对一个网红的忠诚度——减轻了#ad标签的负面影响,提高了照片创意的积极影响。我们认为,与影响者相处的经验证明,对真实性(深度)的期望越高,不真实的负面影响就越高。我们还讨论了我们工作的局限性和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信