THE COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST TIMOTHY IN THE 14TH-CENTURY TOLSTOVSKII APOSTOLUS

M. Novak
{"title":"THE COMMENTARY ON THE FIRST TIMOTHY IN THE 14TH-CENTURY TOLSTOVSKII APOSTOLUS","authors":"M. Novak","doi":"10.22213/2618-9763-2021-2-66-71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the lexical and grammatical parameters of previously understudied commentary on the First Timothy, presented in the 14th-century Apostolos manuscript, containing the continuous text. In order to determine the commentary textological status in this manuscript, the author studied the linguistic material in two aspects: first, a search for similarities and differences with twenty other hand-written sources from the 12th-16th centuries was done; second, the degree of accuracy in following the Greek original was established. It proved the original position of the commentary in the Tolstovskii Apostolus: the main text of the epistle is similar to other sources, whereas, in the commentary, the lexical and grammatical variants of the Tolstoy manuscript are not supported at all. It may indicate the influence of the still unknown protograph containing the commentary. In terms of exactness of following the Greek primary source, the Tolstovskii Apostolus gives greater accuracy at the lexical level. At the grammatical level, inaccuracies can affect the transmission of Greek grammemes or syntactic constructions and can be due to the syntactic complexity of the Greek text. Also, certain errors and discrepancies not previously noted in the epistle and its commentary edition were commented on .","PeriodicalId":431363,"journal":{"name":"Social’no-ekonomiceskoe upravlenie: teoria i praktika","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social’no-ekonomiceskoe upravlenie: teoria i praktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22213/2618-9763-2021-2-66-71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the lexical and grammatical parameters of previously understudied commentary on the First Timothy, presented in the 14th-century Apostolos manuscript, containing the continuous text. In order to determine the commentary textological status in this manuscript, the author studied the linguistic material in two aspects: first, a search for similarities and differences with twenty other hand-written sources from the 12th-16th centuries was done; second, the degree of accuracy in following the Greek original was established. It proved the original position of the commentary in the Tolstovskii Apostolus: the main text of the epistle is similar to other sources, whereas, in the commentary, the lexical and grammatical variants of the Tolstoy manuscript are not supported at all. It may indicate the influence of the still unknown protograph containing the commentary. In terms of exactness of following the Greek primary source, the Tolstovskii Apostolus gives greater accuracy at the lexical level. At the grammatical level, inaccuracies can affect the transmission of Greek grammemes or syntactic constructions and can be due to the syntactic complexity of the Greek text. Also, certain errors and discrepancies not previously noted in the epistle and its commentary edition were commented on .
14世纪托尔斯泰《使徒传》对提摩太一书的评注
文章讨论了词汇和语法参数的先前未充分研究的评论,提摩太前书,呈现在14世纪的使徒手稿,包含连续的文本。为了确定本稿评注的考据学地位,作者从两个方面对语言材料进行了研究:首先,与其他20个12 -16世纪的手写材料进行了异同的研究;其次,确定了遵循希腊原文的准确程度。这证明了托尔斯泰《使徒传》注释的原始位置:书信的正文与其他资料相似,而在注释中,对托尔斯泰手稿的词汇和语法变体完全不支持。这可能表明包含注释的尚不为人知的原稿的影响。在遵循希腊语主要来源的准确性方面,托尔斯泰的《使徒传》在词汇层面上给出了更高的准确性。在语法层面上,不准确会影响希腊语语法或句法结构的传递,这可能是由于希腊语文本的句法复杂性。此外,某些错误和差异以前没有注意到的书信和它的评论版进行了评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信