Material Nature, Visual Sovereignty, and Water Rights: Unpacking the Standing Rock Movement

Anna M. Brígido-Corachán
{"title":"Material Nature, Visual Sovereignty, and Water Rights: Unpacking the Standing Rock Movement","authors":"Anna M. Brígido-Corachán","doi":"10.1353/SLI.2017.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 11-foot-tall mile-marker made by activists at the Oceti Sakowin Camp in 2016 is one of the most emblematic visual icons of the Standing Rock movement. Hand-carved from wood and pointing to Native American reservations, nature sites, cities, and foreign countries, among others, the mile-marker post bears witness to the multilayered preoccupations and collective strategies of the protestors against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). The post highlights the value of overlapping places, Native territories, epistemologies, and concerns, while intertribal coalition building, solidarity, and the urgent vindication of sovereignty through visual resignification gain center stage.1 In line with this land-based, Indigenous-centered, and multivocal milemarker, in this essay I explore Native American environmentalism through a historical and visual analysis of the 2016–2017 Standing Rock/#NoDAPL movement. I give a brief overview of the history of the movement and then focus on a specific set of the group’s decolonizing strategies, which are articulated around three core issues: 1. A reassertion of Traditional Environmental Knowledge (TEK), human rights, and place-based solidarity—all of which are central to ongoing Native American struggles for self-government (Coulthard, “Land”); 2. A critical revision of historical imaginaries and decolonizing practices; and 3. The struggle for visual sovereignty (Raheja, “Reading” 1163). These practices aim to subvert shifting media portrayals of Native Americans that continue to feed from symbolic spatial settings and (neo)colonialist stereotypes. Significantly, the set of photographs examined in this essay (which are taken from social media sites managed by the #NoDAPL movement: Indigenous Rising and Indigenous Rising Media) rarely attempt to capture or represent water, even though this other-than-human person, a sacred but also material/physical being in Native American epistemologies, is key to understanding the plight of Standing Rock and of other Indigenous com-","PeriodicalId":390916,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Literary Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/SLI.2017.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The 11-foot-tall mile-marker made by activists at the Oceti Sakowin Camp in 2016 is one of the most emblematic visual icons of the Standing Rock movement. Hand-carved from wood and pointing to Native American reservations, nature sites, cities, and foreign countries, among others, the mile-marker post bears witness to the multilayered preoccupations and collective strategies of the protestors against the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). The post highlights the value of overlapping places, Native territories, epistemologies, and concerns, while intertribal coalition building, solidarity, and the urgent vindication of sovereignty through visual resignification gain center stage.1 In line with this land-based, Indigenous-centered, and multivocal milemarker, in this essay I explore Native American environmentalism through a historical and visual analysis of the 2016–2017 Standing Rock/#NoDAPL movement. I give a brief overview of the history of the movement and then focus on a specific set of the group’s decolonizing strategies, which are articulated around three core issues: 1. A reassertion of Traditional Environmental Knowledge (TEK), human rights, and place-based solidarity—all of which are central to ongoing Native American struggles for self-government (Coulthard, “Land”); 2. A critical revision of historical imaginaries and decolonizing practices; and 3. The struggle for visual sovereignty (Raheja, “Reading” 1163). These practices aim to subvert shifting media portrayals of Native Americans that continue to feed from symbolic spatial settings and (neo)colonialist stereotypes. Significantly, the set of photographs examined in this essay (which are taken from social media sites managed by the #NoDAPL movement: Indigenous Rising and Indigenous Rising Media) rarely attempt to capture or represent water, even though this other-than-human person, a sacred but also material/physical being in Native American epistemologies, is key to understanding the plight of Standing Rock and of other Indigenous com-
物质自然、视觉主权和水权:解开立岩运动的包装
Oceti Sakowin营地的活动人士于2016年制作的11英尺高的英里标记是立岩运动最具代表性的视觉标志之一。用木头手工雕刻而成,指向印第安人保留地、自然景点、城市和外国等,这个英里标记柱见证了抗议者反对建设达科他输油管道(DAPL)的多层次关注和集体策略。这篇文章强调了重叠地点、本土领土、认识论和关注的价值,而部落间联盟的建立、团结以及通过视觉辞职来迫切维护主权成为了中心议题根据这个以土地为基础,以土著为中心,多声音的里程碑,在本文中,我通过对2016-2017年立岩/#NoDAPL运动的历史和视觉分析来探索美洲原住民的环保主义。我简要概述了该运动的历史,然后重点介绍了该组织的一套具体的非殖民化战略,这些战略围绕三个核心问题进行阐述:重申传统环境知识(TEK)、人权和基于地方的团结——所有这些都是正在进行的美洲原住民自治斗争的核心(库特哈德,“土地”);2. 对历史想象和非殖民化实践的批判性修正;和3。视觉主权的斗争(Raheja,“阅读”1163)。这些做法旨在颠覆媒体对印第安人的不断变化的描绘,这些描绘继续从象征性的空间设置和(新)殖民主义的刻板印象中汲取灵感。值得注意的是,本文所检视的一组照片(取自#NoDAPL运动管理的社交媒体网站:原住民崛起与原住民崛起媒体)很少试图捕捉或表现水,尽管这种非人类的人,在美洲原住民的认识论中是神圣的,但也是物质/物理的存在,是理解立岩和其他原住民网站困境的关键
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信