‘Some Really Raging Peculiarity’: Female Fetishism in The Little Girls

P. Smith
{"title":"‘Some Really Raging Peculiarity’: Female Fetishism in The Little Girls","authors":"P. Smith","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474458641.003.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter shows that many of Bowen’s female characters have curious relationships with inanimate objects, endowing them with special powers or personal attributes. The pattern of these relations, in which certain objects obtain an unusual significance to their possessors, even, in some cases, to the extent of being preferred over relationships with other people, is obvious in Bowen’s works, yet it eludes the usual definitions of fetishism. Critics attempting to theorize female fetishism have tended to rely on paradigms articulated by Freud (ie erotic) or Marx (ie consumerist). Neither of these constructs, however, adequately describe the relationships with objects that possess overwhelming importance to many of Bowen’s characters and, through these attachments, lead often lead to perverse consequences. Recently, however, German theorist Hartmut Böhme has postulated that fetishism is an entirely European concept, one crucial to our understanding of Modernism. Using Böhme’s axioms of fetishism and Modernism as well as insights from anthropological and theological sources, this chapter explores female characters’ ‘object relations’ (not necessarily in the Freudian sense of the term) in Bowen’s works.","PeriodicalId":359891,"journal":{"name":"Elizabeth Bowen","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elizabeth Bowen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474458641.003.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter shows that many of Bowen’s female characters have curious relationships with inanimate objects, endowing them with special powers or personal attributes. The pattern of these relations, in which certain objects obtain an unusual significance to their possessors, even, in some cases, to the extent of being preferred over relationships with other people, is obvious in Bowen’s works, yet it eludes the usual definitions of fetishism. Critics attempting to theorize female fetishism have tended to rely on paradigms articulated by Freud (ie erotic) or Marx (ie consumerist). Neither of these constructs, however, adequately describe the relationships with objects that possess overwhelming importance to many of Bowen’s characters and, through these attachments, lead often lead to perverse consequences. Recently, however, German theorist Hartmut Böhme has postulated that fetishism is an entirely European concept, one crucial to our understanding of Modernism. Using Böhme’s axioms of fetishism and Modernism as well as insights from anthropological and theological sources, this chapter explores female characters’ ‘object relations’ (not necessarily in the Freudian sense of the term) in Bowen’s works.
“一些真正愤怒的怪癖”:《小女孩》中的女性拜物教
这一章表明,鲍文笔下的许多女性角色都与无生命的物体有着奇特的关系,赋予了她们特殊的能力或个人属性。这些关系的模式在Bowen的作品中是显而易见的,在这种模式中,某些物品对它们的拥有者来说具有不同寻常的意义,甚至在某些情况下,达到了比与其他人的关系更受青睐的程度,但它回避了通常的拜物教定义。试图将女性恋物癖理论化的批评家们倾向于依赖弗洛伊德(即色情)或马克思(即消费主义)所阐述的范式。然而,这两种构念都没有充分描述鲍文笔下人物与物体之间的关系,而这些关系对鲍文笔下的许多人物来说具有压倒性的重要性,通过这些依恋,往往会导致反常的后果。然而,最近,德国理论家哈特穆特Böhme假设拜物教是一个完全欧洲的概念,对我们理解现代主义至关重要。使用Böhme的拜物教和现代主义的公理,以及从人类学和神学来源的见解,本章探讨女性角色的“对象关系”(不一定是在术语的弗洛伊德意义上)在鲍恩的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信